• f00f/eris@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The website claims that sponsors have no direct influence on the project (“board seats are not for sale”). The reality is that no project of sufficient scale to fully implement web standards can survive without a significant amount of funding.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      from the FAQ

      • How can you be “independent” if you have sponsors?
      • All sponsorships are in the form of unrestricted donations. Board seats and other forms of influence are not for sale.
        • cerement@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          (sad part is even if they sold out, they’d still be leagues ahead of the compromises Firefox and Chrome have made)

          • bolexforsoup
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I do not understand how folks like you get so shitty about Firefox taking Google money for making it a default search engine when that is the very clear, very limited extent of their relationship. This is the definition of “don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.” Because Firefox is pretty damn near perfect. I feel like I have to be missing something here.

            What is the issue here? What compromises have they made that make them so irredeemable? If it’s the search default for google that’s just not sufficient IMO.