J.K. Rowling is embroiled in a fresh row with another Harry Potter actor over transgender rights.

Following exchanges of fire with Daniel Radcliffe and others, Rowling has blasted David Tennant after the Goblet of Fire star voiced strident views on those who speak out against trans rights.

During an appearance at the British LGBT Awards over the weekend, he called on British equalities minister Kemi Badenoch to “shut up” after she advocated for banning trans women from entering women’s toilets and sports teams.

In an interview at the same event, Tennant called transgender critics “a tiny bunch of little whinging f*ckers who are on the wrong side of history, and they’ll all go away soon.”

Earlier in the week, Rowling branded people like Tennant the “gender Taliban.” In posts on X (once Twitter) on Friday, she expanded her comments to address Tennant’s “wrong side of history” quote.

Rowling wrote: “This man is talking about rape survivors who want female-only care, the nurses currently suing their health trust for making them change in front of a man, girls and women losing sporting opportunities to males and female prisoners incarcerated with convicted sex offenders.”

She added: “For a man who’s supposedly a model of compassion and tolerance, he sure does want a lot of people to cease to exist.”

Previously.

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    Glad to not see the usual “separate the art from the artist” crowd that can’t stop giving her money to continue to be a fucking plague on humanity.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      What always gets me about those people is if it’s real art, the artist is putting their message into the story. When I was young and in the target demographic, I stopped reading halfway through because the message of the story was getting confusing or annoying. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a main character get more selfish in their character arc. I later found out that Harry’s solution to owning a house with severed heads everywhere was to put doilies over them during the holidays.

      The books are bad and where probably only tolerable in the beginning because of the editor.

      • sem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Duuude. You put it so well. They fell off hard after Goblet of Fire, not that the cracks weren’t showing before

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Unpopular opinion, Voldemort is a boring villain with puddle deep motives. He should never have survived the first book.

          • sem
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s the thing though, that kind of works for kid lit

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      The worst is, that she feels validated in her hateful opinions by the money she makes.

    • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      that can’t stop giving her money

      well… I mean… you don’t have to