Wouldn’t they benefit from more people? Of course it would come with the condition of learning the language at an acceptable level and that being tied to residency.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    Countries like Korea don’t have a cultire of welcoming people from outside and therefor you would have so many clashes that a huge number of imigrants - which is needed - would destroy the country. There is no one here who knows how to treat and integrate those immigrants. There are no programs for them, etc. and even if you know the language you still have huge culture clashes.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think there’s a difference between being prejudice towards an outside group and not wanting your own culture replaced.

        There is nothing inherently wrong with countries and their cultures not wanting to have others integrate. In the past this is what helped them survive.

        It’s only a big issue in countries like the US that want to be a mixing bowl/melting pot and also are being xenophobic.

        • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do you understand the difference between integration and immigration?

          Yes there is something wrong with not wanting to allow people from other cultures to integrate into your own.

              • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                That’s a weak argument. Just because I bring up another point of view doesn’t mean I subscribe to the view mentioned, which I don’t.

                If a country doesn’t want to allow immigration then that’s perfectly moral. It may eventually kill their culture off in the long run but it’s not xenophobic by definition.

                If a country does allow immigration and then is prejudice towards a group coming in then absolutely that’s xenophobic.

                • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Backtrack if you want, but what you said was xenophobic by definition and I’m not going to bother arguing semantics.

                  Edit: I like how you completely changed your comment after I replied. Very cool

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean to some degree yes, but as I said they are absolutely not prepared for it and have no one who could do the work of preparation of integration of migrants.