• chumbalumber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not necessarily. A surface (e.g. a cylinder) isn’t ‘flat’ in our dimension, but is 2D

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, but Flatlanders still can’t hide behind anything in their environment. They’d be hidden by the very curvature of space, which is really the same as being too “far away” to be seen.

          • chumbalumber
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not particularly bothered; this seems just semantics to me. Depends on if you view ‘hiding on the other side of the cylinder’ as being too far away to see. I don’t think it is, but if you feel differently that’s fine.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well think about it from the Flatlander’s perspective! They can’t even perceive the cylindrical shape of their space. They wouldn’t be able to go behind the cylinder from their perspective, all they could do is go forward far enough that the shape of space hides them.

              It’s not just semantics imo, cuz it would apply to us as well. If you’re ever confronted with a 4th dimensional being then the only way you can hide is to get far enough away. You can’t see the curvature of spacetime so that’s useless for you.