• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Our system of government means one of these two assholes will be the next president. Do you want three helpings of genocide or two? It’s going to be one of those outcomes so do you have the courage to say less genocide is desirable?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You’re acting like convincing me means anything…

      Biden needs to convince 10s of millions of people. Politicians like Obama and Bill Clinton could do that, but they were charismatic in addition to being the lesser of two evils.

      It just makes zero sense to be running Biden.

      If all that matters is beating trump, why force a candidate that supports genocide? Why is it ok for Dems if trump is worse? Why not at least someone that people like and is a good speaker?

      Like, you understand someone slightly less bad as trump is still pretty fucking bad?

      Where do you draw the line if you’ll support “some” genocide?

      If it was trump VS Mitch McConnell who would you vote for? Would you finally realize it’s the parties that need voters, not voters that need parties?

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Here’s the bad news - the primary is over. Administratively, if we switched Democratic candidates now there would be immense voter confusion and democrats would end up splitting the vote between the two.

        The only way out of this is if Biden literally dies before the election, and I think that’s highly unlikely.

        In terms of supporting genocide, America is going to genocide and part of being a responsible voter is making the least awful choice.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Here’s the bad news - the primary is over

          It’s not tho.

          The convention is the end of the primary.

          Biden appointed Jamie Harrison to the head of the DNC.

          And Jamie Harrison set the convention for mid August.

          If you don’t like it, go complain to them. But they picked when the primary was over.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            If someone else wins the convention I’ll pop a bottle of champagne but I think it’s nearly impossible. If you can get Whitehouse on the ballot though… I’ll buy the next round.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              So…

              You don’t think it’s possible the DNC or Biden does the right thing to maximize our chances of beating trump?

              The primary isn’t a real election. The DNC can just nominate someone else, they’ve been very open about it

              And Biden can obviously just step aside.

              Do you think they don’t care if trump wins? Or that they’d just rather that happen then a Dem candidate Dem voters want winning?

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I think it’d lead to vote splitting within the party if not done precisely correctly. We could essentially be looking at a Woodrow Wilson scenario.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The party says who is on the ballot…

                  I really don’t think a significant amount of voters would write in Biden over any listed Dem.