• Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 months ago

    Congratulations conservatives! With this ruling, you just drastically increased the size of the Federal government.

    Simple administrative rulings are gone so now we’re going to end up with five zillion more expensive lawyers, a lot more judges, and a gazillion more cases before the courts.

    It’ll also increase the cost of doing business! Because now instead of just having to occasionally deal with an administrative body full of technical people who know what matters and what doesn’t every company is now going to have to hire teams of lawyers to defend themselves in court and explain every little thing to a jury of total laymen.

    The companies that violate the law regularly with the intent to “just pay the fines” will now have to defend themselves in court over and over and over again. You think immigration courts are overloaded? Now every federal court will be!

    Perhaps they thought this would just result in businesses no longer having to comply with regulations? Hell no. Next year’s Federal budget is going to balloon in order to pay for all these new inefficiencies.

    They are insane.

    Of course, this is conservatives modus operandi: Don’t bother looking at real outcomes and real consequences of their actions! Instead, look towards tradition and religion and only that which is right in front of their face.

    • Zorsith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bogging down federal courts is a benefit to conservatives. It means their shitty laws can continue to take effect for longer while they wait for the court to get to them.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s like everything else conservatives think they want: “We want illegal immigrants out of the country! But we’re not willing to fund more immigration courts/judges. Let those court cases back up forever so they can stay here indefinitely! Oh wait…”

        Conservative: “Tesla chose Texas for their new whatever, yeeeee fuckin’ haw yo! That’s a lot of money that will come into the state!”

        Bystander: “But don’t they have to settle that case with the EPA before they can proceed? I mean, they totally fucked that river and will have to pay for cleanup.” (note: this is hypothetical river fucking)

        Conservative (and Libertarians, oddly): “Yeah yeah whatever. That’s why we have the courts!”

        Bystander: “Except that court case won’t be heard for years because the courts are backed up. Apparently there’s not enough money in the Federal budget this year to pay for more judges, courthouses, and lawyers to handle cases like that”

        Conservative: “Then they need to increase taxes! Oh wait…”

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Conservative: “Then they need to increase taxes! Oh wait…”

          Conservatives literally believe that lowering taxes increases tax revenue by increasing the total revenue to be taxed by more than the decrease caused by a lower rate.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is what these fuckers have been working on for so many years. Finally came to a head in a clear-cut partisan line vote.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tldr of the holding:

    When the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial.

    Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-859_1924.pdf

    Edit: Here’s the text of the 7th Amendment for non Americans

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Eh - i dunno. They “stripped” them of being able to convict without trial by jury. That’s it. Which they do sometimes anyway.

    And, If they go to trial they’ll quadruple the penalties / sentences just because that’s how federal prosecutors do.

    I’m not convinced it’s all bad just yet. I could be wrong but that’s the takeaway i got so far.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hahahahahahaha

    What oligarchy? What fascism? No see only the winners win because they already won, you all lost that’s fair and square.