fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1816
arrow-up1816imageI just cited myself.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squareCrozekiel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·5 months agoThat’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-25 months agoThat’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing. 3/3 = 0.99999… 3/3 = 1 If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
minus-squareDagrothus@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-25 months agoNah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof
That’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
That’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing.
3/3 = 0.99999…
3/3 = 1
If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
Nah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof