Samsung sees 95% drop in profits for a second consecutive quarter::Today, Samsung posted its Q2 2023 financial results. The report says Samsung’s profits have dropped considerably compared to last year.

  • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    1 year ago

    each new phone is more expensive, with less functionality.

    hover on the touch screen? gone

    iris scanner, gone

    headphone jack? gone

    air pressure sensor? gone

    humidity sensor? gone

    ir blaster, gone

    meanwhile I get charged out the ass for storage space.

    Why the fuck would I want a newer phone?

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the SD card slot missing, S20 was the last one that had it. I still don’t know what to get after that, just because of the missing SD.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Internal storage on phones is over 200gb by now. I havent needed an SD for years. What the fuck do you store on your phone that could still need an SD? lmao

        • Balderdash@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a young son and it was getting very irritating having to be selective recording my videos of him. I finally just paid $90 and added a 1TB premium sd card, and now I won’t have to worry about it at all & download all the videos I want for us.

          Upgrading the internal storage to 1TB on a new phone costs several hundred dollars.

        • jcit878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          4k video files will fill your phone up mighty quick. especially if you use it for youtube videos or similar. or film your family/pets a lot

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Record 1 minute video, how big is that file? 200 MB, 0.2 GB. 5 minutes and 1 GB is full. When something interesting happens, 5 minutes are recorded easy, obviously. 200 GB, nothing for apps, maps, downloads,… are enough to record 15 hours of video. Then that is it. How many moments can I capture with that? Enough for maybe 2 years? I don’t throw my memories away when I get a new phone. Instead, I just buy a new SD every few years and compress the video files every once in a while.

      • Sukisuki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got an A52 just for that reason. Still using it. I wanted a S20 but they were sold out and I was told they stopped making it.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pointless unintuitive feature that’s replaced with simple press and hold.

        Unintuitive for you, perhaps. I found it more intuitive than the press and hold (until it became ubiquitous), since it made more sense for a preview. Press and hold, in my mind, is more for secondary menus and alternative options, like mass-selecting.

        The air gestures were also nice if I had my hands full, since they worked without turning the screen on, and without touching it, although they leaned more heavily on the gimmick side of things.

        Slow and unreliable compared to fingerprints. Anyone actually used it?

        Yes. I use it a lot when I have my phone on a stand, or when I have gloves on. Fingerprint readers don’t work through gloves, for obvious reasons, and it’s less effort than having to fumble around with my phone and my gloves, especially when I will be putting the glove back on afterwards.

        Since my phone also has the fingerprint reader on the back, rather than the front, it also makes it much easier to unlock my phone without picking it up, which is nice when it’s on its wireless charging pad, or I want to quickly check a notification or something, rather than needing to pick it up.

        As for speed, I’ve not found it that much worse than the fingerprint, especially once the camera’s fired up. The hard part tends to be aligning yourself just right, and that you need to tap a “confirm” button compared to the one-click that fingerprint does.

        Who needs these things? Weather apps work just fine. Rather use the space for battery.

        The space won’t be used for battery. It’s a small chip on the PCB, and Samsung would either keep it around for other sensors, or would leave that space blank. Having a tiny battery protrusion like that is silly anyway. Having a little dingle like that would just make the battery more likely to be damaged and erupt into a violent conflagration.

        I personally found it handy, even if it was underutilised. Sometimes you want information from within the house, not outside of it, and if your phone can fetch that information and present it, you don’t need to go and buy a separate hygrometer and air pressure sensor, and carry it around, or have to feed that information via an external service.

        Unless you’re looking to vandalize public tvs, just replace it with any number of wifi/bluetooth remotes.

        Assuming that your TV comes with support for those. If it doesn’t, such as if it’s an older television, then you would be out of luck.

        Personally, I used mine a bunch back in the day, just because it was nice to be able to fire up the VCR, Amplifier, and TV all in one button, rather than a bundle of loose remotes, but that’s more of a first world problem, and less of an issue these days, since television is on the decline.


        More importantly, though, the phones aren’t cheaper despite the loss of these features. The phones just get more expensive, even though they had fewer sensors and features like that.

      • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Counterpoint: phones like Redmi 9T have it all. Headphone jack, expandable storage, IR blaster, NFC… Also manages to have an “okay” battery capacity that’s 6Ah.

        The only problem is it costs too little so people don’t consider it.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          First, even for Xiaomi that phone is crap with a myriad of software related complaints alone. On the hardware front its cheap because cheap in gets cheap out. Underpowered even for 2021.

          • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh I see. I just …hadn’t noticed. Probably because these people are overreacting. But sure, if you need to justify getting a new smartphone, you better spend loads of money to make sure it looks good on benchmarks.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is that technology isn’t supposed to get in the way of us doing things and that’s exactly what removing features that are useful to people does.

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Usually there is a compromise somewhere though. If they could just add all the features without any downsides, they surely would (and demand a premium for it). Granted, sometimes it is just cheaper to get rid of it (and thus make more profit), but sometimes its just a decision to cater to a minority or provide a benefit for the majority of users.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Slow and unreliable compared to fingerprints. Anyone actually used it?

        Hadn’t had a Samsung back then, but I would love to.

        Air pressure/humidity sensor

        I’d love those.

        IR blaster

        It’s still very useful, I used it regularly on my older phone.

    • updawg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget color changing led notification light. You could pay with your phone at old card readers using MST. Oh yeah, and the S9 had a blood pressure sensor.

      • Screeslope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Samsung Note 10 and others have a barometric sensor, though I’m not aware of any app using them. Which might explain their removal, sadly.

            • egeres@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh boy this is a weird tool hahah, I love it!! Can’t thank you enough for this recommendation, it always bummers me how wasted are most phones in terms of potential, when I used to fantasize about futuristic portable computers as a little boy I though that people would become a short of cyborg that would do “magic” with their computers. Turns out, phone became the “squary-glassy attention sink machine” xd

              I was thinking on accessing the pressure sensor via termux and then export that data to a csv file with some python script! phybox looks ver interesting to gain control over my devices 😗

    • Ⓑⓡⓞⓚⓔⓝ@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They want to keep competing with and copying Apple/iphones, yet they keep forgetting about what makes Android phones so appealing to the people who select these phones over iphones.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least Samsung has proper video out through the USB port. Unlike the trash that Pixels depend on, such as Chromecast. What kind of GPU doesn’t have either HDMI or displayport (through USB-C like Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, Steamdeck, laptops, etc. ) out in this day and age?

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holding tight on to this Samsung Note 9 until it finally dies. Battery is still ‘ok’ for now, will last a full day.

      Snapdragon, not that pos Exynos

      Finger print reader on the back is the only way to do it. Wife has had several newer models with built in front side fingerprint reader and it has been ridiculously unreliable by comparison.

      Iris Scan

      Face Scan

      Headphone jack

      Micro-SD Card

      USB-C

      Wireless charging

      NFC with payment support

      And even the stupid pen thingy that I use maybe once a month.

      Not 5G but the 4G LTE is usually more than fast enough even for streaming when using as a hotspot.

  • hardypart@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    1 year ago

    When money is tight you might use your phone for a year or two longer. 1000 Euro phones also don’t help the matter.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I don’t use a Samsung, I am over half way through my phones fifth year. Other than a battery replacement I’ve had literally no problems whatsoever.

      If only lifespan and right to repair were written into law everywhere.

          • jaywalker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because PCs are from a time before tech monopolies. They are based on a spec that allows different vendors to work together. As a result there is more competition, more options for repair, etc.

            • deus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wonder how long this will last. We’re already seeing Apple getting some crazy performance with their M chips with integrated RAM and GPU, wouldn’t surprise me if PCs start becoming less and less modular as time goes on.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have quite a number of systems capable of running Windows 11. Microsoft won’t allow it. Thankfully I run mostly Linux. But your point is not as solid as you think it is unfortunately…

            • redwall_hp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, though technically they started out as reverse engineered clones. There were tons of incompatible microcomputer brands before the IBM PC. Then companies like Compaq put out “PC compatible” clones based on specs that came from reverse engineering of the IBM PC. Over time, things evolved toward deliberate standardization.

              Imagine the dumpster fire of legal action, which courts would likely side with, if someone put out hardware that was 1:1 compatible with the iPhone and iOS would run on it. That’s basically what happened, though MS DOS was produced by an additional party instead of IBM.

          • kalleboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because PCs are based on a hardware standard that allows for a standard kernel and pluggable drivers. So you can just take a standard install of a new version of Windows, and toss in the same drivers from the last version, and you’re on your way.

            On ARM, there is no such standard that is widely deployed, the hardware is integrated bespoke for each and every device, so building a new version of the OS for a specific phone means using very specific configurations (where in memory is the GPU mapped? where is the sound chip mapped? on a PC the hardware can plug-and-play detect this stuff, on ARM it has to be hardcoded into the OS for every device). This is made worse by the chips used in mobile phones being proprietary hardware where the drivers are only released to manufacturers under NDA, and these hardware manufacturers often don’t bother to supply updates at all and individual phone manufacturers don’t have enough clout to force them to

          • Thadrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It kinda is. Windows 11 won’t run on older hardware and end of life of the latest version of Win 10 is coming up in 2 years or so. And a bunch of PCs weren’t really ready for Win 10 when that replaced Win 7/8 and again, support for those dropped at some point.

            Lifetimes are usually more lenient with PCs, but it still happens. You can switch to Linux of course, but then there are alternatives for many smartphones as well.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Developers require money, and software maintenance requires lots of developers, testers and other people.

          • donut4ever@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why the bootloaders of phones should be required to be unlocked by law. You can always root your phone and install a custom ROM on it to keep up to date.

          • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes and no. Installing last version of android on a pixel 4 is most likely absolutely fine. And keeping at least security support is likely not a big deal. 3 years of security update support it is clearly a finance department decision. Why 3, why not 3 and half? Why not 4?

            Just because they need predictability in sales, and they attached the support to the “classical” number of years after which you’d like a customer to buy a new tech product. 3 years has always been a magic number for hardware companies, since forever

          • Wooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No not really, formula is no more than 10% production costs pa unless w produced poorly to begin with. It’s even less if you’re running multiple versions of roughly the same thing then the costs are spread over those versions.

      • May@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My Galaxy S10 is on its 5th year I think. Really had no issues with it, even the battery. Only showing signs of slowdown this year.

        Granted, I run my phone on 720p and constant battery saver lol

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also seems like the whole you gotta upgrade every other month hype has long since died down. It’s not the exponential improvements that it was ten or twelve years ago.

      • Wreckronomicon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I couldn’t agree more. I have a Zfold 2 that I’ve had since launch (3 years) and I look at the phones on offer now that I have an upgrade available and I see no reason to upgrade to a new phone for a marginally better camera and processor, there hasn’t been enough innovation in mobile tech in that time to warrant paying another £1000+ over another 3 years, I’ll rock this phone phone until it dies the same way I did my Note 9.

        • jerkjaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m in the same boat. I’ve still got an S10 from launch, although it’s noticeably wearing down in performance now. I’ll wait to the holiday season to see if I can get a deal on a new Samsung. At that point I’ll have used the s10 for almost 5 years. Used to get a new phone every other year but that’s not needed or wanted now.

          • Wooly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hell, I’ve had a £100 phone for 3 years already and it’s absolutely fine. I’ve noticed a little battery degregation but it still lasts a whole day. Plus a cheap batter change will make it last year’s more. I can’t understand why anyone would still sing those contracts for a new phone every 2 years.

      • Danatronic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve had my LG G8 for four years now and I’m just starting to look for replacements. Unfortunately the G8 is known for the battery being very hard to replace or I would be looking into a battery replacement service instead to get a couple more years of useful life.

    • Mereo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m still using my iPhone 8 Plus that I bought in 2017 and it still serves well since I don’t play games.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry. I’m just trying not to get evicted due to living in a country with the highest rent, internet, food, and data plan prices.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Government. Not liberals or conservatives, but the government as a whole. Canada has had many years where both liberal and conservatives were in charge, and nothing changed.

        Canada doesn’t allow competition. We have 3 main internet providers, 3 main phone plan providers, like 2 grocery store chains, a couple airlines, etc.

        When other companies attempt to come in to break up monopolies, they lobby, and get them shut down.

        I mean where are we going to go? America isn’t really an alternative, as much as Americans think it is. Our healthcare, gun laws, etc are things that make Canada really good. We could move to some European or Scandinavian country, but that’s not as easy as it sounds, especially when you need to learn a new language, get accepted, move your entire life, and live in such a different culture.

        So people in Canada just accept it. Maybe one day monopolies will be broken up, but there are no parties that are going to do that now. Left or right leaning.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Government. Not liberals or conservatives, but the government as a whole. Canada has had many years where both liberal and conservatives were in charge, and nothing changed.

          Huh, it’s almost as if they don’t encompass as much of the political spectrum as they’d like us to believe.

            • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Capitalism and free markets are separate things within the economic “sphere” of society. Capitalism is an economic doctrine that focuses on directing production through private capital; free markets (in theory) ensure “equal access” to markets for products (as compared to monopoly or (economic, not necessarily drug) cartel markets which restrict access).

              Over in the “public sphere”, governments decide whether to jump in bed with private capital (often resulting in monopolies or cartels in economic marketplacs), or to make & enforce regulations that protect the (so-called) free market.

              Or to make and enforce regulations that protect consumers – i.e. human f-ing beings – and enrich local economies without protectionism and “zero sum games”, but I guess we shouldn’t get too carried away here ;)

        • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I haven’t even seen a North American have a kind of acceptable political understanding in the 2020s until now.

          • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty of real people are quite aware of our current issues, they just get drowned out online.

        • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have a similar thing in Australia with our supermarkets, airlines and media. Our governments have been equally as stagnant in trying to change things. Housing and utility prices are fucked as well.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s big and cold. How much food do you think grows there? There’s actually plenty of cheap land but people like to live with other people.

        If you don’t want modern conveniences, I bet it’s cheap. I bet you can live off of potatoes and chicken for like $0.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not cheap. Buying a crack shack in a shitty province with basically no job opportunities costs more than a nice place in LA.

          Actually.

          Getting a piece of shit, run down, SHARED town house in Nova Scotia costs more than a decent house in LA.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can get a rural house with land for no money. You can grown your own potatoes and raise chickens. That life is exceptionally cheap. But like I said:

            People like to live with people.

            So the problem is, Canada is big and cold. No one wants to live in the cheap areas.

            • jiji@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I watch a girl on YouTube who bought a run down old house in Nova Scotia + plenty of land for I think $64k? It obviously takes a lot of work to get it modernized but it was technically liveable when she bought it. But it’s kinda out in the middle of nowhere and therefore not as desirable.

              (If anyone cares, she’s a booktuber but she has a whole video series on refurbing the house. Her name is Ariel Bissett.)

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least you don’t live in the city with the highest rent prices. Our countries treated housing like and investment scheme which drives up local tax revenue resulting in reduction year in year of new developments (assuming Canada has the same supply Constraints as here) . The reduction is fueled by the tax revenue however also by the increasing amount of investors and owners who vote. They don’t want their asset values to decrease so it’s artificially kept high the value component of the assets left long ago, we are in fictional valuations now.

      Regarding food, their is no other way around monopoly or duopoly other than supporting farmers markets. By supporting them they can grow their base and bring down prices. Not sure what else can be done here. It’s a real problem for us here.

      Electricity prices are skyrocketing here and that’s squarely landed at the feet of poor renewables planning. Mandatory coal plant shutdowns without having replacement capacity in place is killing people when the elderly & vulnerable can’t afford AC during the heat waves.

  • dgilluly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

    This is a sign of an upcoming recession if we aren’t already in one. People are starting to run out of their savings due to stagflation and are looking for areas to cut. Buying a new phone every year or every other year and replacing laptops every 5 years are among the first things to go in anyone’s budget.

    So currently the only people refreshing their devices are the people who NEED new devices.

    Capitalist economies always need spends out of desire and not just necessity.

    Worst part is instead of reversing the gouging these companies will probably just go ham on the planned obsolescence.

    • Myrbolg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or simply that prices have become insane. Good phones used to be around 400, taking me a few days to think about it and say yes. Now they are beyond 1000, so I will do my best to avoid having to upgrade and go with custom ROMs again. In the meanwhile, we also lost exchangeable batteries, external SD cards, and microphone jack, and we gained more Google spyware and bloat.

    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The gouging is insane. £300+ for a tablet keyboard case for the s9 ultra.

      I got one free as a preorder for the s8 ultra. No chance I am paying that much for a keyboard.

      • Sheltac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even my iPad keyboard (the folio from Apple) “only” cost like £180. Samsung’s going nuts.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Samsung isn’t on planet earth with their prices. I was avoiding them anyway because I believe TouchWiz is an inferior interface than stock Android. Just way too much bloat.

        • Oneobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bloat is negligible. In fact it is their software that keeps me stuck with samsung. Its a total superior hardware and software experience.

          Just wished they hadn’t gone down the Apple courage route and bumped the price and pimped the features.

          • dgilluly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re the only one I’ve heard of who was happy with it. One of the guys I worked with, traded a new at the time Galaxy S-series phone back into his carrier to exchange for an iPhone because it was very laggy. After seeing one in action I didn’t blame him. It was laggier than my cheap Moto G series, which had a lot less processing power and slower storage. And this was back in 2017, so not too awfully long ago. But maybe things have changed since then.

            • Oneobi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              2017 was a long time ago.

              Like with everything you need to invest time to learn the features. If you just want a phone with basic capabilities then you are better off getting other brands.

              The spen itself is packed with so many features but rarely does anyone bother learning them. Samsung have developed a powerhouse for productivity and unfortunately that means I’m stuck with them because nothing else compares.

              Everyone is on their own journey and I agree that it is not for everyone.

              • dgilluly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Part of my job still is to help people connect their work email to their personal smartphones, if they want to. Many buy Samsungs because their carrier’s store still sells them up front compared to other brands of Android. Though it’s mostly A-series phones.

                The problem with it is that Samsung doesn’t put the access to the features in convenient or intuitive locations so many users just get used to not using them anyway. The only feature, I as a Pixel user envy over Samsung is the right side menu thing. But anyone with iPhone experience or experience using an Android that has gesture nav enabled by default, wouldn’t think to try it even with the spen because that is the gesture to go back.

                Ofc Pixels can do multitask yet many don’t realize that because you have to click the app icons at the top of the recent apps screen to access the menu for it. So I guess I don’t have room to talk about that aspect as a Pixel user.

                But Bixby? I honestly think it’s a waste of resources for Samsung when they could have just used Google Assistant like other brands. I mean Bixby is okay but still lacks in some areas, but Samsung invested a lot of resources and effort into it just to come up with something that barely keeps up with Google’s Assistant.

                Also I’m not a huge fan of their app drawer still. I guess I’m more of a “I just want to see an alphabetical list of all apps” on the app drawer type of person.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember reading vague claims that this was expected by samsung and it was just the cost of something they did some years ago to eliminate competition. Unfortunately I don’t have anything more concrete but someone else might know and add a comment.

    • blarco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You hit the nail on the head for me. I loved my Galaxy S9+ but it was over 4 years old and literally falling apart. I just replaced it with an S23…but also as others have said, I think the S9+ was better. I’m especially having issues with the camera (look up bananagate) and my old car doesn’t have Bluetooth so I have a USB C to Aux adapter that randomly cuts out sound so for a lot of drives I just put the sound up on my phone speakers and play directly.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got a cigarette lighter usb port to provide power to a Bluetooth -> aux dongle. Works well.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh, might not be a bad time to do it as long as you don’t sink yourself into debt too much or have to take out high interest loans. Because if the crash happens while you’re studying and by the time you graduate things might start recovering again. I guess we’ll see.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly I don’t think greedflation is an official term. Stagflation was the closest I know about anyway.

  • YaksDC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    Foldable devices seem like the 3d TVs of the last couple of years. I will not be getting one any time soon.

    • WhatASave@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      After having one, it’s really amazing and the form factor and random utility it brings (built in tripod, easy to aim flash light and be hands free). The screens just need work. The crease is a non-issue as far as using the phone, but the little screen protectors that manufacturers say not to take off will deteriorate after like 6 months.

      I think it’s close though and I do often miss my foldable.

      • Bakachu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have had a samsung foldable and in a 2 year time period I’ve had to replace the factory installed screen protector twice. It started w a little crack that crept upwards until the whole protector was split in half. Ended up just peeling it off after the 2nd replacement started cracking. I imagine ppl don’t like the idea of not being able to protect their screens for one of their premium products…

        On the flip side I did watch the superbowl from a hotel pool with this phone and it was perfect for that.

    • BrooklynMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      and who even wants this? a couple of friends have them, and it seems like nothing more than a weird novelty. in sci-fi, the phone unfolds to become a tablet, not folds in half to become… uselelss while potentially damaging the screen for no good reason.

      this is a classic example of one of those technologies that you think would be cool, but once you have it, you’re like, “eh, never mind.” but Samsung went all sunk cost fallacy and doubled-down on it, losing billions. brilliant!

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          from what my friends have told me, that novelty wears off real quick, and is replaced with the concern it will break or wear out— which happens more frequently than manufacturers claim. if not the screen itself, then the hinges, which were a common problem with the old flip-phones, too, back in the day.

          I mean, you like what you like. I’m just speaking from a practical standpoint in that any moving parts = a high manufacturing cost and higher rate of defect and breakage. the primary advantage of the “candy bar” form factor is that it reduces/eliminates moving parts and potential points of failure from the physical design.

          I admit… I really do miss the idea, even the feel of flipping a phone shut. hell, I even miss slamming a phone down to end a call. angrily jamming my finger into a screen to end a call is REALLY unsatisfying, and often ends in my throwing my phone across the room, and I’ve thankfully developed the habit of throwing it at my couch to save on replacing expensive smartphones, lol. but, until tech evolves tot he point where we get phablets a la Westworld or Legion that can unfold into a super-slim tablet rather than fold down into a flip-phone from the past whose screen could actually just break at any moment because the tech was rushed…. yeah, I’m not interested.

          • moup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was going to say I miss slam-shutting my flip phone too but have realized that I only talk on the phone like 3 times a week so I wouldn’t be getting a foldable just for that

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had a Motorola razr in 2021 that was a good phone, the crease never really bothered me but after 6 months of use the touch screen stopped working and then the pixels started going out on it before it stopped working entirely.

            I loved the form factor but it’s just not reliable enough. I’d probably only buy another clamshell foldable if apple made it because I trust them not to rush a half baked product to market.

        • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had flip phones before smartphones became default, I loved the intuitiveness of answering, locking, etc, and I love the idea of a foldable smartphone because of the size of the screen that you can get into a pocket

          Same here, was on flip phones for the longest time. I loved the compactness. They became scarce some years ago so I started buying smart phones, currently a Samsung. That thing is huge and unwieldy. It does not fit well in a pocket so I don’t carry it around. I always have to find someplace to stow it, often in the center console of my car.

          A folding smart phone could be a solution, but they’re all really expensive. I don’t spend a lot on phones and never will. Right now I’m looking to replace my under $300 Samsung with an under $300 Motorola. Functionally my Samsung works well, but I hate all the Samsung bloatware on it. I know Motorola uses a fairly stock Android image and hopefully it will be a bit more compact.

    • Wreckronomicon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see why you’re saying that but I love my fold and I don’t think I could go back to a regular phone anymore, you quickly get used to the screen real estate and its difficult to give it up imo. While the outside screen is too thin on my fold for my fat fingers you get the best of both worlds of a phone and a more portable tablet, I get it if its not your thing but I find it very handy to have that extra work space on my phone.

      • Bakachu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the same boat with my foldable. It’d be a handicap now to watch videos on a smaller screen now that I’ve gotten used to the bigger one. I only use the small screen for phone calls now because it’s awkward holding the large screen to your face for that.

      • TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While the outside screen is too thin on my fold

        Yep, I’m hoping they’ll do a slightly wider tri-fold model at some point. I’d like to have a wider front screen, like Galaxy S22 Ultra sized, and then be able to unfold twice to get a ~3x sized tablet-sized screen.

        Not that that would help with the already astronomical price-tag of the Z-Fold.

  • pizzazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    1 year ago

    Drops in profits can mean investments, new hires and a myriad of other stuff. No meaning in the headline whatsoever. Profits are not revenue.

    • moistclump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, apples done those things and we said the same thing about those moves. And now look at em.

      • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except Samsung has competition. Apple has blind loyalty.

        I need to replace my Samsung phone soon and I’m looking at Motorola. An Apple user just says I need to replace my phone soon. Then they get to spend an arm and a leg to do it.

        • ghostBones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apple has blind loyalty

          I agree. However, I also think that vendor lock-in is the true culprit. The strange thing about Apple users is that they get locked into that platform and there is little escape, but instead of feeling resentful, they swell with pride instead. Apple user = proud capative.

          • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its also beacuse Apple dosent have cheap tier of phones. So you have the classic went from a 100 dollar android to 1000 dollar iphone case. Like no shit sherlock obviusly extremly cheap phones are crap. Also for some reason the most common phone Brand on the planet is somehow treated like a status symbol. I would kinda uderstand sony phones being status symbol or samsung foldables but iphones But truth be told I really dont get Apple users. I tried one and other than it being really smooth (beacuse my Main phone is a cheap huawei) it was worse in every metric that mattered to me other than sound while costing 4 to 6 Times as much .

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          blind loyalty

          Maybe for some people. There is however a strong momentum to just keep using what you are used to, and Apple has done a great job in that regard. Stuff just works and it keeps working mostly the same and even switching to a new device is almost effortless. Plus their design guidelines for apps is providing a pretty consistent user experience, zero tinkering required. Which is what a lot of people like.

      • R00bot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        When apple did them they were seen as reasons not to buy iPhones, now everyone has copied them it’s no longer a factor in whether you buy an iPhone or not.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        apples done those things and we said the same thing about those moves. And now look at em.

        True, however a lot of people really don’t care about that stuff which somehow often gets overlooked here and on reddit.

    • Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had 3 Samsung phones in a row but I’m over it. The bloatware is too much for me at this point.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe they could stop taking features away from their phones. Put a micro SD and aux jack back and I’d buy one

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeh it’s expensive but I vote with my wallet. Sony’s build is the best I’ve ever had. Software is close to stock AOSP with nice Sony improvements. Only issue I see is Sony are slow to roll out major OS updates. All in all, I’d argue it’s one of the best devices I’ve had over the last few generations.

    • Alchemy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe I am in the minority but I’ll never need an aux jack again and I see it as another point of failure for water damage.

      • donut4ever@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of people use the headphone jack still. Bluetooth will never be as good as direct connection. Some people don’t own cars with all that Bluetooth bullshit, or just prefer to use the jack since it is lossless audio. People want to charge and listen to music at the same time.

        • Thteven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why I’m still using my LG v60, it had the best headphone jack and dac at the time and probably still does looking at everything else currently on the market.

          • donut4ever@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I personally don’t use the headphone jack at all, but I still want it back for people like yourself. Also, being ok with the headphone jack removal led to removing the sd card slot, then the charger from the box. Next they’ll be removing the charging cable and send us just a fucking phone. They’ve boiled us very slowly in their pot

            • Nommer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Next they’ll removing the charging cable and send us just a fucking phone.

              Oh you mean like google did? I was pretty surprised and disgusted they didn’t include a charging cable with my pixel 7. All I got was a 6 inch data transfer cable.

          • krayj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m still rocking the v60 also. LG started packing a world class DAC into their smartphones back with the LG v35 and kept it going all the way to their pinnacle (the v60). The v35, the v60, and everything in between had audio superiority that still hasn’t been beaten by other modern flagships.

            I’m going to be inconsolable when my v60 finally needs replacing.

            • pipler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              V50 user here (didn’t get V60 cause of the larger size) I broke my phone a few months ago, filtered GSMarena for a replacement that’d fullfil my criteria, and Sony Xperias were the the best of the few options that it spat out. Ended up just fixing the V50 for $100, I too will probably hold onto this until it actually breaks.

          • donut4ever@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Removing useful features to make people spend more money on something else you’re selling isn’t “technology progressing”, it’s capitalism at work. It’s corporations milking their users. The whole removal of the headphone jack started by apple to make their users buy their airpods. More money, my friend. More money.

            • cdf12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not to spend more money, there’s a real increase in value Bluetooth provides to most people. Yes there are edge cases, but when you can get a a blue tooth headset for $5-20 it’s not really cost prohibitive any more.

              Remember when the singe piece Bluetooth mics were like $100 when Bluetooth first started hitting mainstream phones? Many people didn’t think it was worth $100 to use an unwired headset for phone calls.

              Well now, that phone is also your entire music collection, your cable box and much more. Being untethered makes a lot more sense.

              In addition, easily Bluetooth destroyed device batteries, now it’s more power and you can just leave it running all the time in your phone.

              • donut4ever@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It IS to spend more money. Does apple or Samsung sell you Bluetooth headphones for $5 - $20? Nope, those cheap ones are a side effect of the removal of the jack and the instruction of Bluetooth airpods. And it’s a good side effect, btw. I do agree with you that Bluetooth headsets are much better than wired in terms of convenience and not being tethered to your phone, but there are way more use cases of the jack than just for headphones. There are professionals who would never ever use Bluetooth over wired that got fucked over and had to use converters and shit. I do see your point.

                • cdf12345@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think also, the removal of the port allowed for better engineering around the screen and better waterproofing and thinner devices.

                  I think with the EU mandating phones use USB-C, it might push apple into to drop port charging all together. You may see MagSafe only charging iPhones in the EU or everywhere soon.

          • wreckage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just because it’s more modern doesn’t mean it’s a 1:1 replacement.

            Wired is cheaper, and it has better quality, but it can also be annoying if you’re doing sports.

            It’s the same for HD and SSD. I still prefer HD to store multimedia and backups, despite being slower and older than SSD.

            There is no reason for them not to coexist.

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some people don’t own cars with all that Bluetooth bullshit, or just prefer to use the jack since it is lossless audio.

          I really hate that cars seem to drop a built in music solution in favor of smartphones. Give me a good radio and a cd player or sdcard slot over any smartphone connectivity and I’m happy.

      • krayj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I am in the minority but I’ll never need an aux jack again

        There is still significant lag for bluetooth audio on both ios and android platforms. It’s doesn’t really impact calling, and it doesn’t really impact watching video content (because they figured out how to measure that latency in real time and inject artificial delay into the video stream so that audio and video sync). But what they haven’t figured out yet is the answer for bluetooth audio for gaming. When gaming, you can’t arbitrarily delay the video feed so that it lines up with audio, so the bluetooth audio experience is complete dogshit for any gaming scenario. If you game, you have to use the physical cable or the constant audio lag will drive you mad.

        Also, there used to be (still are) a fair number of accessories designed to work through the aux port. Examples: mobile credit card readers that connect through aux jack (like square/paypal) that are used heavily by small vendors (especially for shows/events); also things like selfie sticks that use a cable plugged into the aux jack connected to a length of wire running inside the selfie stick to a button on the end of it.

        The market is starting to come up with wireless versions of these things, but the modern wireless versions now require unique ios and android versions of them when the aux-jack solution used to be platform independent.

        Also, the audio quality of an aux jack is an order of magnitude superior to anything that can be piped through bluetooth…still.

        I very much appreciate devices still throwing traditional aux jacks onto mobile devices. Ideally, there will be a wireless technical solution that eventually is superior, but that technology is definitely not bluetooth and we’re still waiting for it to be invented and hit consumer availability.

        • hypnotoad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would love to read more about the Bluetooth lag. Does it affect Bluetooth dac’s like the fiio btr5 as well?

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Almost all of those are pretty niche problems though. Which explains why they just aren’t a high priority for manufacturers.

        • 768@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do they need all this space for?

          They removed the keys for the screen. Ok.

          Phones got bigger for the screen. Ok.

          Phones got thinner, monolithic-like and they removed replaceable batteries. Why?

          They removed the 3.5mm jack. Not ok, full stop.

          They removed the SD card slot. A cloud’s not a storage card.

          I heard they’re removing SIM card slots as well.

          Gradually making phones into TV’s with sensors is bad. What if next you’re considered dead or criminal when offline?

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      But you can say this about any phone company these days (besides Sony, they still have it all) or you can blame them for taking the ‘apple’ direction of taking away everything and charging more.

    • ChickenBoo@lemmy.jnks.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funnily enough they still have expandable storage on the A54. It’s only their best models where they know they can gouge for more storage.

      • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its actually kinda ridicoulus that somehow features get removed from the top kodeks first and then it slowly trickles down to cheaper phones. You would think pepole paying literaly a 1000 dollars for a phone would complain first and foremost. But then again some pepole replace their phones every 2 years Just beacuse(its not like you need need new more powerful phones for pretty much any use including gaming, with the only known to me exception being emulators, but that is a very specific niche ).

      • Calcium5332@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have expandable storage on a lot of cheaper phones, as well as Aux ports. I chose my phone, the A23 5g, over the A53 because of the Aux port, and it is still an amazing phone.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the spen, and never had trouble with the finger print scanner… But you nail the rest of the list.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was so happy when they released those commercials with their commitment to the headphone jack after Apple abandoned it.

      After they dropped it, they made sure I’ll never buy another phone from them. They probably don’t care. They probably make more than enough through their bluetooth headphones.

        • kalleboo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sales are “only” down 37%, it’s profits that are down 95%. Which means either they’ve had to discount their phones, or they’re not selling enough volume to make up for R&D.

    • float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Either you make products that people want or you don’t, it seems pretty simple to me.

      Imo even big companies fail to realize that they don’t know (or care) anymore what the customers want. Marketing used to be: analyze the market and find out what’s a good product to sell. Nowadays marketing is: make personalized ads and try to push whatever crap is cheap to produce to people who don’t realize they don’t even want this. Also make it look a lot better than it actually is.

      Samsung, stop trying to imitate Apple, it’s no use. You don’t have the vendor lock-in and cult-like status to pull that off. Just make good products at affordable prices. Ask the customers what they want, it’s that easy.

      • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re very correct. A core belief at apple is that the customer is too stupid to know what they want, so you can whatever you want down their throat.

        There is some merit to the idea that true innovation won’t be anticipated by customers so you have to take risks. But the way apple does it pisses me off to no end.

        No apple, removing every port (except shitty ass lightning ports of course) is not a good idea. It just isn’t.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ask the customers what they want, it’s that easy.

        Don’t forget though, that the typical customer may be very different from the bubble on this site.

  • PlatypusXray@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who could know that refusing to patch critical bugs or, for that matter, to put any effort at all into software while constantly raising product prices would piss off the customers? It’s a mistery!

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t believe that the whole Android ecosystem -and I mainly blame Google, let Apple outplay it at system updates. It was always going to come to a head as people keep their phones longer and longer.

      • PlatypusXray@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the introduction of the article above: „Samsung blames the decline in smartphone shipments for its financial troubles. Samsung is hoping the launch of its foldables will help level out these losses for the second half of the year.“

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like a classic trust thermocline. Sales tend to keep stable and users put up with the shenanigans and prices while execs keep ignoring user’s complaints, until suddenly there is the straw that breaks the camel’s back and sales drop suddenly.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    And remember, nobody is actually losing money, they just aren’t making as much as they’d hoped. You make shitty products and you homogenized with Apple losing anything that made you distinct and close to worthwhile. Fuck Samsung, all my homies hate Samsung.

  • Hapa_B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol everyone commenting it’s because THEY don’t want to buy a new phone. Samsung supplies screens, electronic internals for other companies, and a fuck ton of appliances. They don’t only make phones…

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yet the article says Samsung attributes that to the phones market?

      Samsung attributes this loss in profit to the decline in smartphone shipments due to “high interest rates and inflation.”

      Something else that doesn’t seem to bode well is the fact that Samsung believes the boost that came from the launch of the Galaxy S23 series has faded.

      And expects a comeback because it’s launching new models…

      The manufacturer highlights the launch of the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Galaxy Z Fold 5. It also believes that the smartphone market will make a return.

      This seems to indicate that most variable profit comes from the smartphones market.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just in a vacation rental looking at a Samsung mini-split AC and wondering if it was good or not haha.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their washing machines and dryers aren’t great compared to LG, so I would be suspicious of their ACs.

        • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Samsung and LG are both garbage when it comes to washers, dryers and the worst for refrigerators.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, this is the chaebol system at work. The Faustian deal between these megacorps and the citizens of South Korea means that it is impossible for Samsung to fail or to be accountable for their bad business decisions. South Korea is the most developed cyberpunk technofeudalistic society.

    • A2PKXG@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      without any kids. They’re in for huuuge trouble.

      They went from one million births in 1960 to just 250k last year.

      The birth rate is below 1.

      with a birth rate of 1, four grandarents make a single grandchild.

      Once we go below 1, most people will never even be grandparents.

      The boomers will enter retirement age soon, I’m not really sure how that will work.

      They definetely won’t be able to do anything against North Korea. They will either be bedridden or care for someone bedridden.

  • Macropolis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Samsung sucks and most corporations in tech have horrible practices. At least the big ones. Profits over people is there motive. Tech should be human friendly