• SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    AFAIK most historians/scholars agree that Jesus was a real person (even if a lot of the Bible’s claims about what he did are not true). But I’m not a historian. What are you basing your opinion on?

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly this. The person did exist. There’s proof of that. It wasn’t the son of god and didn’t perform miracles, but he was real nonetheless.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Important notion that Jesus never claimed to be the son of god and that entire line of thinking was established some four hundred years after.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

        So we have to differentiate between what is the actual Gospel and life of Jesus and what the more creative parts of the churches invented on top of it over time.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. John 8:58

          Which is from one of the original 4 gospels. Apparently there’s evidence of it being written as early as 70AD. There’s a couple other quotes I found in a link some other person linked in this thread but this one seems most direct.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think this is a terminological confusion. The original Gospel as in the life and teaching of Jesus, that got lost as it wasn’t documented in his lifetime.

            The four gospels that made the choice are as you said collections written later. And there were many more Gospels that the early church decided not to put into the bible. On top of that there is the issue how those gospels got translated multiple times and each translation inadvertently adds a layer of interpretation.

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ah, okay. But then we can’t really make a claim either way, can we? We don’t really know who he was or who he claimed to be.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, but that doesn’t change the fact that there was (most likely) an actual historical person who is the origin of these stories, i.e. Jesus. He’s probably not really as fantastical as the Bible would have you believe, but he did exist, as opposed to being just an entirely fictional character.