• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I never said they weren’t capable. I’m just saying that this prosecutor seems to be choosing to not prosecute something seemingly obvious, which just makes them look incompetent. If they want to appear that way to the public, that’s their choice.

    Nothing prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it as a hate crime due to exculpatory evidence, instead they seem to be intentionally leaving it in a grey area. Especially since this apparently happened a month ago according to the article. Plenty of time to figure out something so core to the issue. It just makes them look complicit in allowing hate crimes when the public evidence is so glaringly obvious for it.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Nothing prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it as a hate crime

      The thing that prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it is that they are still considering prosecuting it.

      Deciding on a charging strategy takes a lot more thought than posting a hot take.

      EDIT: And let’s not forget that she is most definitely being charged with attempted murder, so no matter what the DA decides she’s gonna have a bad time.