This guy can be pretty harsh at times, but he’s clearly very knowledgeable..

However, not all providers have a recent review, and his priorities are skewed heavily to the “paranoid” side of the tech world. For example, he considers being able to mail cash to a provider a significant pro. The overwhelming majority of users aren’t mailing cash to pay for their email.

Overall, it’s good info that’s worth sharing.

    • Banshee@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, his requirements for an email provider are well above what most people need.

      Email is not a secure means of communication in most cases. If the recipient isn’t encrypting, then your communications to them are vulnerable anyway. And in the vast majority of cases, they probably aren’t.

      Really, the best thing about getting a more privacy conscious provider is not giving all your data over to Google.

      • TurtleTourParty@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I switched to Posteo mainly so all of my emails aren’t scanned by an advertising company.

        The main thing I dislike about the encrypted email providers is that I can’t use my own client, I’m stuck with whatever features they want to give me.

    • Myrbolg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly my reasoning. Get away from Google and advertising (though they said they are not using Gmail for that), get a better interface, masked emails. Fastmail is great.