A lot of old games have become unplayable on modern hardware and operating systems. I wrote an article about how making games open source will keep them playable far into the future.

I also discuss how making games open source could be beneficial to developers and companies.

Feedback and constructive criticism are most welcome, and in keeping with the open source spirit, I will give you credit if I make any edits based on your feedback.

  • vzq
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think a compromise could be that developers would have to open source their games if they drop support, like entire support not just maintenance mode, so that the community can maintain them from then on. They could still have some sort of licensing to ensure the code isn’t used for something else or the product used for profit (this would not include something like maintenance cost for online titles so that community ran servers could be paid for).

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not only do the games need to be opensource, but their toolchains too. It would also be great if everything were stored in content-addressable storage. Then it wouldn’t be necessary to track down stuff by follow URL paths to dead domains.

    I hope that opensource game engines become more popular. It might just be a matter of time. Blender is now very popular and that’s opensource.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • JairajDevadiga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree, it is better to be open source all the way. I believe Godot became more popular after Unity tried to charge developers per install.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I agree with you, that’s why I don’t believe in paying for closed source

    There is an issue with letting future generations enjoy content in that they may be less inclined to buy remasters or sequels

  • Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s not create 4 reposts such that the discussion is at one place and not spread out paper thin?

          • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Well for me personally it was two reasons. First was a lot of politically charged content. I don’t want to see that stuff any more than I already am forced to, so I just block all of it normally, but on the ml servers it was tiring blocking so much so I just blocked the whole instance Second was the ml admin’s handling of the anime community that used to be hosted there and is now hosted on ani.social. I honestly don’t remember too much other than the admin claiming something along the lines of “all anime characaters are children” or something like that. I don’t remember it exactly, but it was some mindless take that communicated “we don’t want anything related to anime on our server.”