• Pleb@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know what the difference is and don’t play those map video games.

    But I do like shoving little soldiers around the table top. And the only thing historic about those is that most of them are no longer being produced.

      • Pleb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The most hardcore “map game” I’m playing is Total War (Warhammer these days). I do love me some Starcraft though.

          • Pleb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh right, there was that one also. Somehow completely forgot about Medieval 2 (was more of a Rome player).

            But my knowledge of their existence comes more from the fact that I was dumb enough to take Latin in school. We had to translate letters by the German ambassador (Busbecq) to the Ottoman Empire from when he was sent to Byzantium Constantinople Kostantiniyye Istanbul (the wiki-article about the names of the city alone is fascinating).

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Hoi4 Black Ice?

          While I love the Total War combo of strategic map play + in the field tactical control, I think there are a good deal of map games even more technically complex, but they are incredibly niche.

          Starcraft is an RTS with no real grand strategy, I don’t think that counts as a ‘map game’.

          • Pleb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I know that they are quite different, my point was that I don’t play those more complex games and usually prefer other genres. StarCraft was an example of that while limiting it to the Strategy genre as a whole.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Sorry, I didn’t fully read all of the comments you’d made before, and my inner nerdsplaining came out.

              That and I’ve been awake for… 36 hours now? Hooray for incredible pain.

              That being said, StarCraft is great!

              • Pleb@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Oh, I was just answering the comment, didn’t realize I made the “limiting to strategy as a whole” remark in a different one.

                Well, after 36 hours it’s well about time to finally get some sleep.

                  • Pleb@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Oof. Ouch. Owie.

                    That sucks big time. Didn’t get any drugs for the pain? Hope you get well soon.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Big maps, little movement, lots of stuff to track; Hearts Of Iron is made for folks like you and me.

      • Pleb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah, a 4’x6’ table is a big enough map for me most days.
        I’m more of a Total War gamer than something like Heart of Iron anyways. Or better yet: some good old Starcraft, if we limit it to strategy alone.

      • Pleb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The difference between what?

        Those map games and shoving little plastic soldiers over the table top?
        Those map games are huge, having many armies on the map and managing your state. While shoving soldiers over the table top usually just involves your one army with no state management at all and the map just consisting of the game you are playing.

          • Pleb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            The context is also my comment you replied to. Didn’t know what difference you meant.

            To make it simple: the Orthodox Christian Byzantine Empire was the eastern Roman Empire that continued on after the western Roman Empire went under.

            The Ottoman Empire is the Muslim Empire that took over after the Byzantine Empire got conquered.