Are we really the kind of county that allows ‘evidence’ to go before a ‘grand jury’ then lets that grand jury ‘vote to indict’ a former president?
Are we really the kind of county that allows ‘evidence’ to go before a ‘grand jury’ then lets that grand jury ‘vote to indict’ a former president?
I think some people are not aware this piece is satire.
Thank you. I was very confused by the title and source
Unfortunately the folks who need to read and understand the point being made will never read it regardless.