minus-squareLocalhorst86@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up27·8 months agoIt’s quite counterintuitive that it takes only 10 Minutes for the temperature to reach 75° inside when it is 75° outside, but it takes three times as long for the temperature to reach 75° inside when it is 75° outside. Thermodynamics are weird.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 months agoMpemba at it again! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect
minus-squareSabata@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoHow long for 160 degrees? I don’t want to get sick.
minus-squaredustycups@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoWe probably should specify that this image is in degrees reaumur (°R)
minus-squarezitrone 🍋@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months ago100° for sure is a very hot and thicc angle
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoThat’s a bit obtuse though. I prefer my angles to be 90°. That’s just right.
Seems legitdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67741/677415fff7f77f95c8da162a6b2af21a62388dfa" alt=""
It’s quite counterintuitive that it takes only 10 Minutes for the temperature to reach 75° inside when it is 75° outside, but it takes three times as long for the temperature to reach 75° inside when it is 75° outside. Thermodynamics are weird.
Mpemba at it again!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect
How long for 160 degrees? I don’t want to get sick.
We probably should specify that this image is in degrees reaumur (°R)
100° for sure is a very hot and thicc angle
That’s a bit obtuse though. I prefer my angles to be 90°. That’s just right.