This opinion is based on reading people’s thoughts on the internet and remembering what I was taught in my own time in school (where they essentially stumbled into teaching that humans were some kind of ‘peak’ of the evolutionary process)

I think people have waaaaayyyy too much faith in human intelligence and it’s leading to the destruction of the world.

1- People keep thinking a scientist or a ‘rich entrepreneur’ is going to come up with some magic bullet to save the world, if we taught more about how other animals have tools, language, larger and older and more complex brain structures than us - People might realize it’s similar to believing that dolphin will arise from the sea with some idea to stop climate change

2- we keep participating in these systems that have been created under the assumption that we are ‘making progress’. I would argue that the minority of human invention represents real progress.

3- It leads to undervaluing the earth and taking it for granted. We worship ourselves as gods (literally). Almost everything you have wasn’t invented by humans. It was the result of billions of years of selective design. Yet we teach as if things we harvest from nature were ‘invented’ by humans. In reality, we often have no way to produce or even of conceive of these things without a natural example.

Thanks for reading

      • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Again humans are biased towards methods that use artifacts/tools.

        If you’re a whale underwater your whalesong is as good as the internet, but whatever its not a physical object and its a totally sustainable method that doesn’t require harvesting half the planet so WE DGAF, doesn’t count!

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whale song is not as good as the internet, and we’re biased toward tools because the jump from word-of-mouth to written information was a colossal paradigm shift. “On the shoulders of giants” is only possible because we aren’t bound just by our living memory and traditional stories. Cultural knowledge aint shit compared to cuneiform tablets.

          • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just want to pick you peoples brains at this point.

            • Humans have had internet for less than 100 years, whales have had sonar and whale song for millions of years, allowing communication and thought sharing over spaces humans weren’t capable of.
            • So then, were whales smarter than humans up until the moment we gained internet?
            • Internet can easily be taken away from you leaving you weak and helpless, whales can’t be separated from their internet.

            Human survival strategy is very min/max glass cannon right now - we are dependent on complex, unsustainable, rapidly degrading systems for survival yet feel superior to other animals for those very same systems. Seems profoundly dumb to me in a way we fail to see because we are so obsessed with our intellect.

            As I said in another comment, maybe it can be said ‘we are most intellectual’ species but its in a kind of rain man way where we lose other necessary wisdom about how to survive long term on the planet.

            • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Your argument makes no sense because humans have been passing down oral history for ages too before the internet and writing. It was literally one person’s job to memorize everything and then teach it to the next “history holder.” That’s why we have such shit record keeping before we invented books. And why ballads and songs were also used to help memorization.

              However to a lesser extent books, but definitely the internet is far beyond a basic data aggregator. It allows instant communication across the entire world akin to telepathy, seemingly endless space for knowledge good or bad, entertainment, business enabling/generating, allows you to 1 way communicate with the dead by reading wisdom from some person 1,000 of years ago. You keep saying “well humans have a tool bias”, yeah no kidding because the tools we make LITERALLY CHANGE THE WORLD, for good or bad. I believe it was the phantom menace who so aptly put it, “the ability to communicate doesn’t make you intelligent.”

              • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                okay why doesnt the oral histories of other species count? They seem to pass down tradition and behavior for just as long, and we cannot observe their inner beliefs about more than that. So why are you assuming only humans do it?

                Cetaceans have a structure in their brain that we don’t have that MIGHT allow them to experience life as a group. That is different than internet but not WORSE just because it doesnt require an external tool. Why are you obesssed with a way of being that ‘CHANGES THE WORLD’ so that you go extinct?

                We’ll agree that our ‘tool intelligence’ doesn’t make us wise at least

                • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re the one arguing animals are smarter because they passed down history orally. Yes some of humanity’s tools have impacted the environment but we also have the capability to save not only ourselves but literally every other species. No single animal ever comes close to this. Period. Call it a god or savior complex, fine, but the truth remains humans are the only species we have ever encountered in the known universe with that kind of power and potential.

                  As to your evidence of cetaceans, I’m not sure that matters considering it’s all hypothetical unproven. You’re trying to weigh something that we can actually confirm against abstract conjuncture like they’re on the same level. I might be a millionaire some day, does that mean I should spend like I am one now?

                  • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    we also have the capability to save not only ourselves but literally every other species

                    yet to be shown. We assume we can turn this around