• moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    5 months ago

    Double negative confused me for a second and I was sad. Opposes the ban! Want gender affirming care available. Excellent.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh I missed that entirely. Sloppy writing, it should be arranged “opposes bans on gender affirming care”.

      • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Gotta get them clicks tho. Maybe we’re at the beginning of a transition from, “shocking and attention-grabbing headlines,” to, “attention-grabbing but also poorly written in a way that it’ll agitate an even wider wash of readers”

    • VoilaChihuahua@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same! “Supports care” would have been an easier concept, though a little different from “opposes ban” I guess…

    • inspxtr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I find it quite common (and confusing) for certain news types like policy, eg “party A reverses the disapproval to oppose the once-unacceptable ban”