Real question. I would like to know what drives you to hate Apple? (In terms of privacy of course because in terms of price it’s another story).

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 months ago

    Android doesn’t support iMessage

    I think it’s the inverse: iMessage doesn’t support Android.

    Those aren’t equivalent statements; the first implies that something about Android makes it impossible for Apple to produce an iMessage client for it when that is purely a business decision on Apple’s part.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You are correct and the person you’re responding to is wrong about just about everything they said. Funny to me they think mms is why those images look so shitty when no android users have ever experienced that without an ios device involved

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        MMS does have size limits that can hurt image quality, but I have the impression iOS applies limits of its own that are considerably lower. I’m not sure why anybody in 2024 wouldn’t have at least a couple modern messaging apps, but it seems a lot of people don’t.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Well yes exactly. I have noticed for years that every photo or video an iPhone sends me is worse quality than flip phones used to send/receive. Amazing to me that iPhone users fall for this trick

          Like they missed that the whole apple MO is to make them feel superior without evidence

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            It seems like an odd decision to me, as it would make the iPhone look like it has a substandard camera to someone receiving media from one by MMS.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It seems unlikely to have that effect when the recipient presumably communicates with people who have other brands of phone, from whom they receive better looking media.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I mean, it certainly has that effect. The in group “knows” your phone sucks and will shame you into getting an iPhone. That’s the idea and it’s probably worked millions of times.

                  • Zak@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Just doesn’t seem plausible to me. If Alice gets low-quality images from Bob and higher-quality images from Charlie, her most likely assumption if she’s not sophisticated enough to be aware of the cause is that Bob’s phone has a bad camera.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Android users would use RCS for communicating with each other via the default messaging app on Android.

        MMS has a hard size limit depending on the carrier the sender uses, that’s independent of the sender using an Android phone or an iPhone. This limit can be as high as “more than 1 MB”, but also as low as 300 KB or even less. Compressing an image down to 300 KB will naturally incur a quality penalty.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Rcs is a new thing and not all android phones use it even now

          Photos sent from iPhones look like shit today and they did years ago. Rcs is not a factor.