I had In The House - In A Heartbeat playing in my head while making this meme
sorry for the pixelation in the corner, I used a shitty website which put a watermark there
I had In The House - In A Heartbeat playing in my head while making this meme
sorry for the pixelation in the corner, I used a shitty website which put a watermark there
I was kind enough to google the whole thing for you and you couldn’t make it past the first example in the quote I was kind enough to pull (didn’t even bother with the article proper, I presume).
So no, I’m not doing any of that. You already have homework and I already have nothing else to prove. Go have fun.
You weren’t kind enough to do anything… you were asked for two specific countries, and provided a very easily disproved link that never supported your original claim…. Probably everyone discussing this topic here has googled and read that before, every country has an income limitation. We’ve established how that discriminates against disabled.
I’ve read far more articles about this, you seem to be one who hasn’t done their homework, and you hold this asinine idea it’s fine to discriminate one way and not another. Everyone always finds a ways to justify their behavior sexist, racists, xenophobia, conservatives like you that protect their hypocrisy on others.
The onus is on you dude, you’ve made the claim, people have debunked it for you, you either support it more, or stop digging in about the same dead point. All it’s doing is showing your hypocrisy as we’ve established comments ago.
I’ll give you an easy one. How is income limitation not discrimination, please. This should be easy for you to answer, and should show us why you are being a piece of work. You went and made another claim you need to support now, let’s go, you fucked up dude.
You can arguing about arguing all you want, it’s not gonna change the facts.
But I do love the “read more articles about this”. The thought of which articles is chilling, considering.
You provided an article, or do simple words confuse you thus?
And what facts? More claims, let’s see these facts that have now claimed have been provided.
Why can’t you answer simple questions? You want to claim the income limitations aren’t discrimination, yet you won’t explain how… what a shocker.
If you do, we can easily explain how it isn’t, but clearly you have trouble accepting that your opinion can’t be wrong.
OK, here’s what you do. You start this thread from the top, then you get to the part that tells you how this works. Then you stop.
I did, there’s lots of people explaining the same thing to you……
https://lemmy.zip/comment/11051328
It’s a very simple concept, using income as a limitation, is a free way to discriminate against anyone you want who would be a burden. And you get people like you, who justify it, so they get to continue to do it. You want less, raise it, want more, lower it. They picked a specific number for a reason……
Look we explained it, and we didn’t even need to get your opinion, since it’s just plain wrong…. Shocker….
If you have money, you’re not a burden… as we established back at comment 2… yet you continued to argue this same asinine point.
It’s not an opinion, it’s how things work, as established by both reality and personal experience. You can keep the inane responses for as long as you want, friend, you’re not gonna dimension hop.