Lawyers for Elon Musk on Tuesday moved to dismiss the billionaire’s lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, ending a months-long legal battle between co-founders of the artificial intelligence startup.

Musk — who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 — sued the company in March, accusing the ChatGPT maker of abandoning its original, nonprofit mission by reserving some of its most advanced AI technology for private customers. The lawsuit had sought a jury trial and for the company, Altman and co-founder and president Greg Brockman to pay back any profit they received from the business.

  • ZeroCool@vger.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    277
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    OpenAI, meanwhile, accused Musk of essentially being jealous that he was no longer involved in the startup, after he left OpenAI in 2018 following an unsuccessful bid to convince his fellow co-founders to let Tesla acquire it.

    So a spoiled brat had a massive hissy fit after not getting his way? Yeah, that sounds like Elon alright.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah he didn’t give a shit if they switched to for-profit, he was just mad he wasn’t getting some of that profit

    • gressen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imagine all the bullshit promises he would make if he bought ChatGPT.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    ·
    5 months ago

    The emails appeared to show Musk acknowledging the need for the company to make large sums of money to fund the computing resources needed to power its AI ambitions, which stood in contrast to the claims in his lawsuit that OpenAI was wrongly pursuing profit.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t think open-sourcing matters too much here: the datasets are all open sourced and the technique itself is published and well documented. OpenAI’s advantage ia that they can burn the $10 million in processor energy that it costs to train each new model of GPT.

      edit: Up through GPT-3, that is (GPT-4 is worse and I don’t know why people would want it)

  • Paradox@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can we just have both entities annihilate each other? Please? They’re both shit

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Elon Musk embarrasses himself by spouting unsubstantiated bullshit yet again. More news at ten.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    Normally seeing after how big tech companies use AI, I would agree with him but he prolly just wants X AI to be the next big thing so he is jealous.

  • Psych@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wait a moment did I just read that musk kinda fought to make open AI nonprofit lol ? Insert the worst person you knew made a great point meme here

    • TwigletSparkle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure Musky boy is annoyed that they profiteered off of the non-profit because that’s exactly what he would do amd they got there first.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not in the slightest. It was just his flimsy excuse to sue a competitor/someone he doesn’t like, and the released emails show he doesn’t believe a word of it. That’s why he dropped it.

      • sodamnfrolic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s 1440 minutes per day, a lock that’s right twice a day is right for 1/720th of the time. A broken calendar, right for one day of 365, is actually accurate twice as often as a broken clock.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, he was vindictively attacking a company he was involved with.

      It just happened to be good for others.