• redplayer5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand how Apple can be a monopoly if there are other viable choices for smartphones. Are people just bitter about apple or is there some corrupt financial play behind the scenes?

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s about the restrictions they put in place on those who have bought their products. They make it extremely hard to leave their ecosystem, overcharge for services, and prevent interoperability with other products.

      They’re only just now allowing RCS to try getting out ahead of these lawsuits. But they still don’t allow side-loading (forcing developers to use their store so they can charge 30% on all sales), don’t allow third-party app stores, and don’t allow third-party browser engines (forcing everyone to reskin Safari).

      Plus, in the US, Apple has 55% market share as just one company. The next highest is Samsung at 25%.

      So yeah, they can play monopolistic games.

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 months ago

      So you don’t understand what a monopoly is?

      Because you don’t have to be the only player in the overall game to be a monopoly, just simply big and powerful enough to be unaffected by the other players which fits Apples description.

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          Precisely. This is why the EU is harder on these companies.

          When you get big enough, there are different rules to ensure that you don’t distort a market by killing competition. That is anti-trust, and that is considered a monopoly.