• Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lol the idea that you need consent to look at someone’s publicly posted pictures is laughably wrong.

    • Emmy@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      View is not the same as “use in a commercial enterprise to turn a profit”. Only a fool would think that’s the same thing.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        This. Anyone can view content online.

        Training a visual model off those images requires feeding those images into a model, and that is not the terms under which you originally viewed them.

        It’s why OpenAI is currently facing tons of lawsuits it may legitimately lose in court.

        Probably not though, they can just settle and pay a fee. Deep pockets.

        • Emmy@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re allowed to take videos in public, yes. but someone can’t then steal that video and use it for just any purpose.

          There’s a clear distinction

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Usually if someone was caught in video they don’t want to be in decent folks will at least blur their face, good people will blur the faces of strangers without being asked.
          What corporations are doing is exploitive and downright greedy. Most of what’s been posted was done before this AI issue was even a thought.
          It’s not hard to be decent towards others. It really isn’t and this AI bullshit is the worst possible application anyone could’ve come up with.