• Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re showing capacity, i.e., a 3.5m sidewalk can move about 15k people per direction per hour. I’m guessing there’s leeway for cars depending on intersection types/design, speed, etc., whereas there is much less variation in average speed for pedestrians.

    • reallynotnick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Average should be a measured real world quantity. A max theoretical value should never be average unless it’s literally always at the max… on average.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The wording on the chart isn’t the best, but I’m presuming they mean average capacity, not average ridership, because every city and every system will have its own factors that can impact the specific capacity of their transit modes. E.g., one system may have double-decker suburban rail vs another’s single-decker, or one system may have articulated buses vs another’s non-articulated. These differences would result in differing capacities, but the purpose of the chart is to show a ballpark number for what the typical capacity of a 3.5m corridor of each type would be, based on averaging system capacities in presumably many different cities.