• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe if you were clearer about what you were saying, these “interpretations” wouldn’t be an issue.

      I’m not sure what the point of bringing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki to show that the U.S. is capable of crimes against humanity is when you aren’t saying that’s what the U.S. is going to do again.

      • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I didn’t. you stated the names according to your understanding. I only stated the facts that have happened in the history, I don’t make statements of my assumptions about what could or would happen.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I stated the names because this is about the U.S. and China.

          So you’re not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China, you’re not even talking about the U.S. and China. You’re talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic in this thread and you’re antagonizing a moderator about it to boot. Did I get that right?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              That would be a violation of our civility rule. I would suggest you do not do so again.

              Now, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.

              • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                My comments were specifically on U.S. and China. until you pick on “Hiroshima and Nagasaki” to divert it, in your interpretation of my statement.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You have repeatedly talked about my interpretation. I have already asked you to explain the connection between Hiroshima and the current tensions between the U.S. and China and you refuse to do so. I’m looking at your post history and seeing a fair amount of trolling.

                  I think it would be best for us to end this conversation now, but I am going to be keeping an eye on you for both trolling and incivility in this community, since you apparently are not aware of the rules in our sidebar.

                  • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    As an example of how powerful it is to have a narrative edge in war. where a government can easily get away with a crime against humanity, without any consequences.

                    I did.

          • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            let me be more clear for you, I’m not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China. If you follow my comments. you may notice, you’re imagining stuff in that regard. specifically, trying to corner me because your opinions differ based on your interpretation of my comment. this is my last time saying this again. CHILL OUT!

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Once again, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.

              • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                My comments were specifically on U.S. and China. until you pick on “Hiroshima and Nagasaki” to divert it, in your interpretation of my statement.