• TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      7 months ago

      And “household income” definition also changed: at the time the most common was that only the man of the household was working. So I’d say we are down to a quarter of what was earned then.

      • moistclump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        7 months ago

        I feel like it’s implying a standard of living. You got more for less, you owned a home. Maybe only one of the family was employed for that life.

    • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think that’s a little unfair of a comparison. The average house price in the US is $495k. The average house price in Ohio is $273k. Let’s take Brooklyn for example. In the 80’s houses were cheap in comparison to today. Ohio in the 80’s were probably on par for what they are today. There was no silicon valley in the 80’s. You didn’t have as much of the super rich mega mansions back then. So yeah, it’s going to sway the numbers.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If we’re going to have super rich mega mansions, then we should be taking care of everyone at a proportionate rate. If we’re not, then the tax for the rich is too low.