• Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 年前

    As the other people mentioned. In North America, the percentage of urban populations is 85%, Latin America 81%, Europe 75%

    Yes, rural areas are probably in need of private vehicles, but not everyone out of those 85-75% of people need a car. We’ve become too reliant on them.

    • yopla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 年前

      Those stats are a bit misleading. For example, I live in a “urban” environnement, aka a town, but the closest anything is still 15km away.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        Fair point, but I still think it holds true for > 50% of people. That is still a huge percentage and the rest of the people that would need vehicles wouldn’t need such destructive infrastructure in the middle of cities. Cities could be a lot more compact, walkable and without 15 lane highways running through the middle. The vast majority of traffic in cities is caused by people who could replace that with public transport or walking in a better planned city.

        Now America is a lot more problematic there because of suburbanisation, idk how you fix that at this point, but I hope that it’s possible.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          I don’t think you do “fix” suburbanization because people who live in suburbs probably want to live in suburbs. Not everyone wants to be in a dense city, for me that sounds like hell.

        • yopla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          What we do have at a walking/biking distance is a bakery, a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an antique store, two art galleries.

          Anything else such as food, school, work, train station, doctor, veterinary, you name it, is 15k away.

            • yopla@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 年前

              Not really, trams are only good if you need more capacity than a bus can provide on a fixed line which is not the case. What we need is exactly the opposite, a small capacity and a flexible route.

              The thing that has the most chance to work in the near future, from a practicality and cost point of view is, imho, a fleet of on demand self driving electric minibus that can serve all the township around.

              Note, we already have on-demand minibus, it’s basically a bus with fixed stop in all the local towns that only come if requested and available, It’s just not very available due to a shortage of drivers.