- cross-posted to:
- ghazi
- cross-posted to:
- ghazi
Edit - Addendum: The video title is quite clickbait-y. The video doesn’t want to debunk any “serious” science, but rather investigates how badly done research with no reproducability or horrible statistical significance is used to influence the discourse in favour of regressive politics.
Doesn’t she mention published evopsych papers right from the very beginning?
Edit: 3 minutes is literally the end of the intro. You didn’t watch any actual content of the video if that’s a correct statement.
Removed by mod
You’re claiming a lot about a video you admitted you didn’t even watch. She discusses several professors of evopsych with published papers, like Geoffrey Miller and David Buss.
You could have skimmed the chapters in the description, at least.
Edit: The titles are obviously real, puplished evopsych papers with a bunch of citations. Examples:
Removed by mod
You can admit that you don’t like her style without claiming bullshit about a video you didn’t watch, homie.
Removed by mod
Why else would you judge the video after you’ve only watched the intro?
Removed by mod
The introduction mostly showed the style of the creator. And it also showed published evopsych papers which the video was about to debunk. It didn’t even mention any “idiot on the internet”.