• PupBiru@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    anyone with a better understanding able to articulate potential trade-offs/complications to using this in practical applications?

    *edited:
    more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624

    the critical field and critical current seem very low … This means you can’t actually push big current through this thing (yet). You can’t make a powerful magnet, and you can’t make viable power lines

    The method to produce this material as described in the related paper [1] is fairly simple and could be done at home with a $200 home metal melting furnace from amazon and the precursors (which also seem to be fairly standard easy to obtain metals)

    Read this comment thread from SC researchers: <reddit link removed>
    Lots of problems with the paper, they claim. It is not up to the standards of current SC research. One of them says Dias’s work shows more merit than this.

    • DominicHillsun@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Insane capacity batteries

      Lossless power transmission via wires

      Better magnetically levitating trains

      Much more power efficient computers, electronics

      The list is huge

      • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only drawback is that LK-99 is polycristalline… Levitating trains and computers, electronics, are a stretch as long as the material is not monocristalline.

        It is huge nethertheless.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          from what i read, it doesn’t seem like you’re able to push much current through it, which makes power cables an unlikely application in its current (heh) form

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        no i know many of the applications, its huge if true! i understand that, but almost everything like this comes with trade-offs, and i was wondering if there are any here that would make it non-viable for some/all applications

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The claimed saturation current is very low. If this is inherent and not just a first-try thing it will be less-good than permanent magnets for doing many magnetic-field things and less-good than Aluminum for some current-carrying things.

          It’s a perovskite, in semiconductor applications these have stability and durability problems.

          It might also be a scam. This would make it useless.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In amongst that discussion is a lot of reason to hope this will be better, several note that the researchers made a low quality sample “spongy crap” and that in other superconductors made at that quality are just as limited, only becoming useful when better quality samples are made

    • DominicHillsun@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be a real bummer if this came out to be untrue. However it’s simple enough to replicate, so we will know soon enough