• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      6 months ago

      She couldn’t care less. She’s aiming for a Supreme Court pick if Trump gets re-elected. She’d be a perfect replacement for Clarence Thomas.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Considering that right now fascists are gaining power everywhere in the “western world”, it doesn’t seem likely. Well, not until decades and probably a bloody war or two later, at any rate.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fascist regimes don’t last long because they all eventually turn their violence inward. They breed the sort of mistrust and lack of questioning that don’t make them effective societies.

        • pearable@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Would Franco’s Spain and Pinoche’s Argentina somewhat contradict that assertion? They both lasted a good long time before there was a slow transition away from their regimes from what I remember.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        And she’ll be a footnote, after she’s spent her life ensconced in power and being showered with gifts for serving the cause. She’ll have a much nicer life than people who had integrity and cared about their fellow man, but we’ll be comforted that someday she’ll get her judgement.

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I doubt she’ll get any judgement in life, and being agnostic I doubt she’ll get any after it.

          Unfortunately, much too often the reward of evil is wealth and power.

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        She probably would not have denied it had the prosecutors had a 3-7 minute conversation with Trump’s defense and had determined they couldn’t have come to an agreement. Prosecutorial arrogance allowed them to just ignore procedure and they figured they could get away with it.

        Also, if the prosecutors have such good evidence, maybe instead of worrying so much about what Trump is speechifying on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, they could just prosecute him? Are they really afraid that a jury is so stupid that they are going to be persuaded by Trump ranting tweets or Xes or whatever they are called now on that enshitified platform? Either they have weak evidence or this is just a power play to try to control Trump’s ability to say what he wants (and ignore the court rules) and they thought they could get away with it.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not much I can do on my end, considering I don’t live in the US. I’ll keep watching the dumpster fire from above.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Holy shit, how are things in heaven, and how do I get there?

          Oh wait, you mean space? Same questions!

          j/k just hoping the populist conservatism doesn’t catch hold in Canada.

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            We have angry Milhouse stirring shit up North, so yeah populist conservatism is on the rise.