• LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    there really is an issue though. it’s an unregulated mess and for every ebiker who is a clean energy micro mobility advocate there’s half a dozen people who buy them because they don’t have a license for whatever reason or are trying to skirt as many road laws as possible.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      So what? If someone loses their license they still have the right to be able to pay their bills. Public transport isn’t always an option, and Uber/Lift are as expensive as cabs now; how else do you expect an unlicensed person to get to work?

      • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        that’s not the point I’m making. I’m not saying those who are unlicensed do not have a right to transportation. I’m saying that there are problems in the space where regulations need to be applied.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Like effing infrastructure. E-scooters shouldn’t be in traffic nor on a sidewalk. Having an actual dedicated right of way appropriate to the speed of different types of movement would go a long way toward making it safer for all

          Really it’s only three- a car lane, and e-anything plus bicycle lane, and a pedestrian lane. But clearly distinct and protected

      • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        no you are wrong. according to scientists and smart people who graduated college, I’m correct here.