• 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same. But that’s out of 200 total so 5.5%. As of 2022 a poll concluded that approximately 7.1% of adult Americans identified as LGBT (source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/389792/lgbt-identification-ticks-up.aspx)

      When looking at it that way it’s actually a pretty impressive accomplishment. Yes it’s not exactly in-line with the population but that would be damn near impossible to do given the various demographics across the entire US.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Being queer doesn’t make you worse at law. Preexisting discrimination and discriminatory forces in law world is causing that number to be so much lower than the wider population and the best way to forcefully address that is to increase representation and visibility in that population.

          These are elite positions. Everyone on the short lists, queer or not, is qualified for the job. The choices made at that point are not for picking the “best” candidate because there is no “best” candidate. There’s different choices. Different viewpoints. Different backgrounds. Different politics.

          And I think the Biden administration is making good choices as far as appointments go. Intentional choices. Choices meant to make a culture shift that needs to happen.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m 100% sure you’re right. My point wasn’t meant to discredit their candidacy, and I’m sorry if that’s how it read.

            I’m simply saying he’s pulling from a pool that is distributed differently than the national distribution, and therefore the pool distribution should be used to reference his selection distribution. It was a comment on statistics, not capabilities.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              To be clear, I object to both comparisons-- both to the population-wide demographics and the law-wide one – though I do clearly think it’s a conversation worth having.

              Because it fundamentally misunderstands what the purpose of representation is. Representation is not an ends on itself, so “matching” population demographics is useless for anything other than identifying likely discrimination. It’s not a numbers game. There’s no “but hey, look how close we truly are to achieving good representation!” It’s not that, because it’s still remarkable that this many queer people have been put into power. They’re the exception to prove the rule that the field is still inherently hostile to them.

              The goal isn’t “equal” or “proportional” representation or anything like that. The goal is elimination of the systemic discrimination. The goal is ensuring that brilliant new minds aren’t being filtered out for being different from the social norms. This is back to the old RGB quote.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                Oh, I totally agree. It should be much higher if the better candidates are also members of the community. The point of brining statistics into the conversation was to get an idea of his inclusion in relation to the selection group, not that he should be trying to meet some quota.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think there should be more than a representative number of federal judges who are queer. Queer people are the most at risk from the law, so they should have the biggest say in the law. Same for racial minorities, women, and disabled people.

      • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes. But the overall percentage isn’t there I’m sure. Patience I know. 6 months left to course correct the previous “regime”

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yet, progressives are contemplating not voting because Biden is “not doing enough.” Guess they’d rather see what Trump has in store for them.

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    throwing a few scraps out to the desperate starved masses does not make Biden an LGBTQ advocate making history

    Biden says his positions are deeply influenced by Catholic social teaching.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden

    Biden is not progressive he a right leaning religious conservative with a prosecutor as a vice president and they have spent their careers putting citizens in their proper places

    Being progressive and making history would be the democrats upping the minimum wage to $20 or more, protecting women’s rights, protecting voting rights, setting up a national healthcare system, getting the police under control

    Everything that the Democrats already promise every election just to get elected

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        And good is way better than Trump/Republican/conservative’s bad.

        I get it Americans, Biden sucks but Trump is horrific, no contest.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        As someone that is gay, fuck Biden. Our rights are no more protected under a Democrat as they are under a Republican. I’m not talking bullshit social shit like marriage or adoption. Until they address things like wages, housing, education, and healthcare we have no rights. Democrats don’t care what bathroom a trans person uses and also don’t care if they are living on the streets doing it.

        Refusal to address wages, housing, healthcare and education is social murder and violence.

        The motherfuckers also gave our marriages to the states where we would have fewer rights.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          “When you ignore everything democrats have done all across our country, democrats are the same as republicans!”

          Great take

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            What have democrats done? We still have wages that suck, no affordable healthcare or housing, not addressing future education costs, no additional protections for trans individuals. Hollow empty platitudes don’t pay the bills or protect people’s right to quality of life.

      • audiomodder
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is an asshole statement.

        I am a member of the queer community, and this is the kind of garbage that distances me even more from Biden.

        FWIW, I did vote for Biden, and it was the first time I had voted for a non-third party for president, but I won’t be voting for him again.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Smart. If you check historical presidential races, all of them had a third party very close to winning, so that’s a good thing to use your vote on. You’ll get 'em this year. And even if you don’t, the consequences are fine, not as if the only other option is an insurrectionist promising to be a dictator and do whatever the oil billionaires ask. Not as if Repubs have been appointing treasonous theocrats to SCOTUS or anything that would hurt vulnerable groups.

          • audiomodder
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yup, I’ve always voted third party because they’ve always had a chance at winning. Because perfect is the enemy of good.

        • die444die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          What’s it called when people do this?

          Trying to shut down reasonable voices by attacking and then saying that type of comment is going to affect how they vote ?

          This feels fake as hell and I see it constantly now.

          Am I the only one who thinks statements like this are just attempts at keeping reasonable people from speaking up?

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            It is fake as hell, or at least used to be. It used to just be Russian trolls but sadly, real Americans saw it enough that they began to think it was a common stance… so then Americans actually started adopting that stance.

            • die444die@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              sadly, real Americans saw it enough that they began to think it was a common stance… so then Americans actually started adopting that stance.

              I prefer to think people aren’t this dumb and it’s all still trolls. That’s my hope at least.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          So you’re a Trump supporter then? Come November, not voting for Bden is either directly or indirectly supporting Trump. No other way to spin it. Naive or a troll.

          So tired of these foolish posts infecting Lemmy.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes and do not expect perfect leaders but at least have them align more with what the citizens want

        remember going to the mall when was younger with a same sex partner and getting the nasty looks and comments when we would hold hands or show any affection especially from the older conservative looking types

        the world does not seem much different than back then some ways less progressive now if that is even possible

        and it should be fucking different now know not the only one

        • audiomodder
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I am also really sick of hearing this crap from Biden supporters. “Oh, so you’re just going to let Trump win?” MF my life has gotten worse under Biden because Democrats didn’t do anything when they held the Senate, House, and Presidency all at the same time.

          So now my state’s Republicans have proceeded to take away rights of queer folks and women with almost no resistance. Now when Republicans pushed through a school voucher program, tons of resistance. Emails, organizing, etc. But the NEA has money, and queer folks don’t.

    • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Look: We are loads of people that agree that more can be done. Don’t use that as an argument to say that this isn’t good. He’s doing good things, and if we keep voting in candidates that are more progressive than the previous candidate, we’ll see progress. Biden is better than trump, next time let’s get someone better than Biden.