• LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Then again, theres about 13 undiscovered, lost, still armed nuclear bombs that the Americans lost in test drops. Mostly dropped into oceans, they’ve been deteriorating away for 70ish years. Wherever they are an earthquake could set them off. Maybe an aggressive shark. The point is, there are 13 points which we KNOW at some point, will set off a WWII era atomic bomb. This will have an unknown outcome, 13 different times. Any one of which might end Earth. Or maybe it causes some tidal waves. No one knows.

    This is completely wrong. Lost nuclear bombs are not going to be functional in the slightest after decades, as they require very precisely timed detonation of explosive charges to actually trigger the main fission reaction. They’re not like chemical bombs, which will explode with enough heat or pressure. And after decades the circuitry to control the explosive charges will be long dead.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is completely wrong. Lost nuclear bombs are not going to be functional in the slightest after decades, as they require very precisely timed detonation of explosive charges to actually trigger the main fission reaction. They’re not like chemical bombs, which will explode with enough heat or pressure. And after decades the circuitry to control the explosive charges will be long dead.

      So wait, you’re telling me that Mr. Burke can’t really blow up that bomb in the middle of Megaton?

    • mememuseum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also, the fissile material has been radioactively decaying for decades and should no longer be refined enough to go critical.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not sure about that, plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24k years and uranium-235’s is far longer.

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re probably right, and in terms of the design yield absolutely right.

      But if just one explosive charge were to miss fire, you could theoretically still get a fizzle that measures in single digit or even tens of tonnes of TNT.
      That’s pretty trivial as bombs go, but it would be incredibly dirty.