Innovation and privacy go hand in hand here at Mozilla…

Is this the time to drop firefox?

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 个月前

    Are we ignoring the part where you can disable it the same way you always could?

    They even when out of their way to assure you if you already had telemetry disabled, absolutely nothing is changing for you and no data is being collected now.

  • ItCantBeThatEasy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 个月前

    I don’t really understand what search topics have to do with improving the browser. The blog post doesn’t make that clear at all.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 个月前

    I’m not a fan of automated data collection, regardless of the reason. I see the merit, though, but I won’t allow it. The post is very clear about the preserved anonymity of the collected data, which is good, and on how to easily opt out, which is great.

    This statement, however, was a bit strange. Almost like they are being flippant on local laws. Since I know this isn’t the case here, they should have phrased it different. (Emphasis mine)

    Your search activities are handled with the same level of confidentiality as all other data regardless of any local laws surrounding certain health services.

    • Cargon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 个月前

      They definitely could have phrased this better. I think what they mean is that their level of confidentiality meets or exceeds local laws.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 个月前

        That’s what I also understood. It’s just an odd, almost incorrect, phrasing. Unless our understanding is wrong, and they actually mean that they won’t follow the local laws if said laws require them to violate privacy.