ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world to Non-Political Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoThey will never not be magicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1464
arrow-up1464imageThey will never not be magicallemmy.worldChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world to Non-Political Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months ago Non-political memes mmm, I sure do love my wife’s body I mean he even makes a whistle sound and this is somehow not political? Lmao?
minus-squaregmanlikescheese@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up54·5 months agoFellas is it gay to find your partner attractive?
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·5 months agoCare to explain to the class why you think this is political??
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoLiterally modeling how men are supposed to feel and express attraction to their partners, how is that not political?
minus-squareAsherah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·5 months agoIt’s political to show positive interactions in a long-term relationship? Are you saying men should treat their SOs like shit…?
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 months agoIt has absolutely nothing to do with the government or its policies, for starters. If you think society should regulate expressions of long lasting attraction, you’ve got issues.
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months ago If you think society should regulate expressions of long lasting attraction, you’ve got issues. Lol that is what the comic is doing
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoDo you have the time or desire to learn about social reproduction theory?
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 months agoI have a feeling it has nothing to do with regulating expressions of long lasting attraction between partners, but feel free to make your case
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoIt does actually! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_reproduction
minus-squareEchoCT@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18·5 months agoAre you really getting offended on behalf of a fictional character? How do you know their relationship well enough to take offense on her behalf anyway?
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoI’m not offended, it is cute. It is also political
minus-squareAgrivar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-25 months ago It is also political HOW?!?!
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoDo you think the way men and women interact isn’t mediated by structural forces?
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoThat statement isn’t internally coherent.
I mean he even makes a whistle sound and this is somehow not political? Lmao?
Fellas is it gay to find your partner attractive?
Mega gayness imo
You have to say no homo.
Care to explain to the class why you think this is political??
Literally modeling how men are supposed to feel and express attraction to their partners, how is that not political?
It’s political to show positive interactions in a long-term relationship? Are you saying men should treat their SOs like shit…?
Yes. No.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the government or its policies, for starters.
If you think society should regulate expressions of long lasting attraction, you’ve got issues.
Lol that is what the comic is doing
how
Do you have the time or desire to learn about social reproduction theory?
I have a feeling it has nothing to do with regulating expressions of long lasting attraction between partners, but feel free to make your case
It does actually!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_reproduction
Are you really getting offended on behalf of a fictional character? How do you know their relationship well enough to take offense on her behalf anyway?
I’m not offended, it is cute. It is also political
HOW?!?!
Do you think the way men and women interact isn’t mediated by structural forces?
Maybe, but not 2 individuals.
That statement isn’t internally coherent.