Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1746cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansprogramming@programming.devmain@rblind.com
arrow-up1746external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansprogramming@programming.devmain@rblind.com
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?
That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?