• sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    You start out by bemoaning the onboarding experience and then move on to portability and then speak up the idea servers should just be relays and browsers should be the new world order.

    Yes, onboarding definitely needs to be improved.

    Yes, portability can be improved. Lemmy falls short of Mastodon and not even Mastodon is perfect.

    But, what mastodon does so is foster does do excellently is foster the idea that social media is a tool and that users shouldn’t be overly attached. Also, perhaps if we learn to value servers, so not treat them as mere relays, perhaps we’ll be able to teach value and independence.

    The problem is, too many people keep trying to think, how can we make the Fediverse relevant in the modern world? And the better question is, how can we redefine the modern world? How can we normalize the idea of cooperative servers? Whether friends, towns, cities, etc. How can we make it so the people running the servers that host our communities are committed and engaged and not running them at a deficit? I would even go as far as to say that there should be government schemes to repurpose old computers into mini servers and that governments should give everyone a domain like NAME.TOWN.CITY and everyone can run a personal server and get used to it and then they can grow from there.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also, perhaps if we learn to value servers, so not treat them as mere relays, perhaps we’ll be able to teach value and independence.

      If you want to be independent, the only thing that matters is the ability to able to roam around and port our identity and data wherever we want. Where you are doing your computing doesn’t really matter.

      government schemes to repurpose old computers into mini servers and that governments should give everyone a domain like NAME.TOWN.CITY and everyone can run a personal server and get used to it and then they can grow from there.

      We don’t need any of that. Computing power and storage is so cheap nowadays that even people in middle-income areas can afford to collect piles of used smartphones on their desk drawers. If there was any type of economic demand for what you are saying, we would have seen by now some company trying to make a business out of it.

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        If there was any type of economic demand for what you are saying, we would have seen by now some company trying to make a business out of it.

        Domain registrars do indeed make money off of this.

            • rglullis@communick.newsOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Right, one can never be certain about the future, but AP is showing some staying power and (I think) the main reason that it’s not evolving faster is because we are not exploring possibilities beyond “let’s clone popular closed networks, and slap some AP to pass data around homogeneous servers”.

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Computing power and storage is so cheap nowadays that even people in middle-income areas can afford to collect piles of used smartphones on their desk drawers.

        I think that’s a dangerous assumption to make. Not everyone is as well off as ourselves. Some people can’t even afford a desk, let alone have a desk drawer full of old phones.

        • rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago
          1. On average, we are rich enough to have plenty of gadgets around.

          2. Those in extreme poverty need access to more important things than access to these gadgets.

          • biddy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. Those in extreme poverty need access to more important things than access to these gadgets.

            We’re going down a sidetrack here but this is just false. A smartphone these days is a ticket to many things required to live. Applying for jobs, applying for government services, buying essential items cheaply, cheap/free education.

            • rglullis@communick.newsOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Applying for jobs, applying for government services, buying essential items cheaply, cheap/free education.

              None of these things are even close to be available to people in extreme poverty.

              Think “no access to running water or sewage systems” levels of poverty, not “living in a ghetto area of an European or North American country”.

              • biddy@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes, even for them, the information they can get through a phone is lifesaving. They can learn how to build water supply and sanitation systems and shelter. They can learn how to farm and forage for food. They can find the best way to cross international borders and become a refugee. And so on, they can improve every aspect of their lives. Information is power, and with a smartphone they have access to the entire world, rather than just word of mouth knowledge in their local community.

                Obviously, places without any form of electricity are screwed, but satellite internet is rapidly becoming cheaper and more accessible so soon they won’t even need cell coverage.

                • rglullis@communick.newsOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I was using old smartphones as an example of the amount of excess computing power available which goes unused, not what people can do with it.

                  Your argument is just missing the point and annoying sophistry. Can you please just drop it?