Broader adoption of keeping cats safe at home would have large benefits for cat welfare, human health, local wildlife and even the economy. So, should cat owners be required to keep their pets contained to their property?

The answer to the question is obviously “yes”.

  • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve always assumed that a cat would go nuts stuck inside all the time. Maybe I’m wrong but I imagine that most people would view it as cruel.

    • Riftinducer@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      Cats go nuts at the witching hour anyway, being inside or outside has nothing to do with it.

      Basically, nah, they’re alright inside. They sleep for between 12 to 18 hours a day and get most active at dawn and dusk, so having some way for them to burn off energy with a good cat tree or the like will keep them occupied. And if they want more than that, they will come to you and make their demands known. And if that’s still not enough and you’re willing to put the effort in and do some acclimatising, you could get a second cat and they’ll keep each other occupied.

    • Baggie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have two cats, they have never been let outside and they’ve been completely happy. Granted the house is a decent size and we have a lot of things to keep them entertained, but that responsibility comes with the ownership I figure.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      They don’t if you exercise a modicum of responsibility and actually make the environment one that meets their needs