She told Swedish media that she will not be appealing the verdict.

      • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “China and India don’t pollute much per person”

        Not accurate, its easy to divide up the industrial waste on the common folk (per person). Ive been to China, its horrid. Makes Buffalo in the late 1970’s seem green.

        Nuclear, then batteries that are made from more common and easier materials that can be safely recycled.

        • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What is the per capita carbon emissions in China and what is it per capita in your country?

          I’ll help, it’s 7.8metric tonnes per capita in China.

          What country are you from?

          EDIT: Oh and it’s a paltry 1.74metric tonnes per capita in India.

          • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes the CCP bot has been ID’ed

            1.41 billion * 7.8 = 10,998,000,000

            335 million * 13 = 4,355,000,000

            Still making less

            • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Per capita is what matters mate.

              Let’s not forget that they’re also making literally everything you use too. If you made that in your own country their emissions would drop off a cliff and yours would rocket lmao.

              Stop being so intellectually dishonest. You’re not thick, why pretend to be?

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Previously you said CO2 isn’t an issue so why are you even bringing up India and China’s pollution levels if you don’t think pollution is to blame for any of this?

      Furthermore how can you claim the current trend is a ‘nano blip’ while we’re still in the ‘blip?’ This is like being able to predict when a stock is at its lowest or at its peak, which requires you to know the future.