• Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    But an end to NATO would be an unambiguously good thing

    If one were to take Russia at face-value, they might lighten up a bit with less NATO.

    A UN where the US couldn’t veto a hundred demands for peace in Palestine, backed by threat of sanctions is also an unambiguously good thing.

    The US is one of like, what, two countries in the entirety of the UN that haven’t yet ratified ICESCR after 50+ years. So, making some more sense there, too.

    I’d not see us leave the UN, though, because then we would truly be screwed. The US would officially no longer embrace human rights, not being a member-state.

    But point well taken.

    If I genuinely believed Trump would bring about a peaceful dismantling of the American Empire, I’d have to campaign for him.

    I’d genuinely be right there with you if he came out as 100% in favor of UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    Not having that is an automatic disqualifier for me.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The US would officially no longer embrace human rights

      The US only embraces human rights of enemy states. We’ve got more prisoners than any other country and support the worst dictatorships.

      • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Until we ratify the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) in the US, I’m inclined to agree.