• AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    At least Biden allows the protests to happen. Under Trump, the first protest would be the last as he would immediately mobilize the National Guard and authorize the use of lethal force to suppress it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is he, though? I know the president isn’t directing this stuff directly, but the harshest crackdowns have been in cities run by democrats, in democratically run states. As the leader of the party he could’ve told local administrators to respect free speech rights of protestors.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        You know what? I don’t know he isn’t directing this stuff directly. All the crackdowns happened at the same time in all those Democratically controlled cities, almost like it was coordinated and that someone at the top ordered it.

        But maybe it’s just a coincidence. 🤷‍♀️

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I was trying to be charitable to Biden, but yeah, the whole thing of ‘Trump would’ve sent the national guard instead’ thing isn’t really functionally different.

          On the other hand, there’s examples of administrators engaging the protestors and giving concessions up to a point where they voluntarily cleaned up their encampments.

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      As opposed to the police currently beating the shit out of protestors. I understand it would be worse under trump, but that’s a really low fucking bar. We should be asking for better, not settling for the regime which is only maiming protestors instead of killing them.