• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t that make 3 in the last 2 weeks? 1 mauled by a bear and 2 more attacked by buffalo? Maybe stay away from the wildlife at Yellowstone?

      • Lux
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, technically Buffalo is incorrect, but it’s still used to refer to the animal. When someone says “buffalo in Yellowstone” it’s easy to infer that they mean bison. It’s like correcting someone for calling a fly a bug.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This isn’t a taxonomical discussion. As such, it is not necessary to ‘correct’ someone for using a widely accepted and common colloquialism.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The hiker was believed to be alone during the encounter, and no bear spray or firearms were found at the scene.

      In other words she wasn’t following even the most basic, simple guidelines for hiking in the woods, let alone in a national park known for its wildlife.

      Visitors should be required to sit for a half hour “common sense” information video before entering the parks.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The attack comes amid a rise in Montana’s grizzly bear population and an increase in sightings.

    The department put out a news release last week warning visitors that staff had confirmed grizzly bear sightings throughout the state, “particularly in areas between the Northern Continental Divide and the Great Yellowstone ecosystems.”

  • starlinguk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why doesn’t it say “Woman killed by grizzly bear”? This way it sounds like the two events are unrelated.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because that is how it was communicated to the reporters, and editorializing would be irresponsible.

      Though the department’s statement said the death appeared to have followed the woman’s interaction with the bear, it did not confirm her cause of death.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they did say “The department said the investigation into the grizzly attack was ongoing”, so there was an attack.

        Still, better to wait for the official word, even when it appears obvious.