"The evidence establishes that the City knew that its failure to properly enforce the 2012 Bylaw would likely cause harm to the taxi industry.

“A multinational giant was invading Ottawa, and because of the City’s unpreparedness and its lack of efforts to develop a plan to enforce the 2012 Bylaw, the City’s enforcement efforts against Uber drivers were ineffective.”

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, FUCK TAXI COMPANIES

    Don’t be fooled, they’re textbook playing the victim, if anything they’re just pissed they didn’t have the idea first to do what Uber/Lyft are doing

    Last gasp of a shitty industry that needs to die.

    • Xabis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      It always seemed like taxi companies were mafia controlled or something. However, I am not sure the labor abuses by Uber has been any better.

      They both suck.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely, but Uber/Lyft are very marginally better, mostly because all the old cabbie tricks (i.e. identifying non-local people and taking them the LONG way) don’t work and when Uber tells you a car is on the way with a time frame they usually are accurate. Compared to some phone dispatch that just tells you a car is “just 10 minutes away” for 2 hours.

        I’d like to see them both die off, but I’m perfectly happy seeing the taxi industry get their just desserts first.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lol company taking advantage of customers in a monopoly outraged that another company was able to take advantage of them better and now it’s not a monopoly. Not rushing to defend anyone here.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes they would also like to avoid regulations and not have to pay for their vehicles

      That doesn’t justify the other side

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        That doesn’t justify the other side

        Never said it did, but at the very least when Uber said they would have a car there, the car was there. When their app says it’ll cost X for the ride, I paid X.

        Too many cab experiences where a “Yea man, prob 20$” turned into a 60$ ride because “the meter says what the meter says”. Too many cab experiences where a car was supposed to be at my location “in 15 minutes” an hour ago. Among other crap they pull

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Don’t be fooled, they’re textbook playing the victim, if anything they’re just pissed they didn’t have the idea first to do what Uber/Lyft are doing

      They still haven’t really done it. Taxi apps that exist are mostly shit. They didn’t want to have the idea first, they just wanted their status quo to persist indefinitely just like any other degenerate sector with an artificial supply constraint.