• Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You said jail is for innocent people.

    So in other words you have reading problems and don’t understand basic English and grammar.

    Now I just feel bad for you.

    • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t have to distract with cheap ad-hominem attacks when I can quote your words right back to you:

      Prison. Not jail.

      Jails are temporary holding areas until you get to see a judge. Which means you could still be innocent at that point.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Read it one more time. Notice the word COULD.

        I never said jails are for innocent people. I said it’s a holding cell for people who have yet to be tried. Which means they COULD be innocent.

        Never heard of innocent before proven guilty?

        Are you really this dense?

        Reading problems.

        • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Stop deflecting and stop trying to gaslight me. If prisons are the same as jails in this regard then why dispute? Why even bring it up? You’re retroactively trying to save face.

          I am fully aware how prisons and jails are similar and how they are different. You’re the one who was trying to correct somebody and then got downvoted to oblivion.

          Oh, but now you were just randomly bringing an unrelated technical point about how jails can hold innocent people now that you’ve been confronted with the facts. /s

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Says the one trying to twist my words to win some moronic argument you already lost. You have a disease. Get help.

            • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That’s three ad-hominem attacks. But sure, those are your “arguments”. Well argued. /s

              But of course, when you have nothing meaningful to say, you just attack people. I guess that’s to be expected. Just blame the person when you get called out. You could have taken this as a lesson and admitted you were wrong, and learned, but you decided to double down and insult people instead. Well argued.