• xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Only one person can win when it comes to property ownership

      Meaning, at the end of the game, more people hate the rich than are the rich. It’s not capitalist propaganda.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean, there isn’t really much evidence it does though, feeling good from being wealthy mostly comes down to not being worried about your material welfare and stability. Beyond that, owning everything really doesn’t make people any happier or more actualized as people. It is just an empty drug that unlike more fun drugs, hurts a massive amount of people every time you take it.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          How do they even study such a thing? Ask megawealthy if they’re happy and they’ll ask something “modest” like “it’s alright, you know life was so simple when I was poor” lol

        • ninpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          The game is (still) a satirical version of the real housing market, and anybody with half a brain gets the impression of unfairness after a game of monopoly. This is unrelated to the fact that parker brothers is making a lot of money with the game

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            anybody with half a brain gets the impression of unfairness after a game of monopoly.

            The trouble is, their incorrect takeaway is that Monopoly is a bad game, instead of the correct takeaway that Monopoly is an excellent demonstration of a bad system. Parker Brothers’ removal of the “prosperity” ruleset ruined any educational value it had.