• gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sacramento State’s updated policy states that it “does not have any direct investments in these areas” right now but, in accordance with students’ demands, its investment portfolios will “remain free of such direct investments.”

    Students: We’re protesting until our school stops investing in stuff that’s bad!

    University: Uh, we already don’t.

    Students: We did it! We freed Palestine!

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think the students though that divesting would save all the Palestinians. I mean, I am sure one person did, but that is what happens when you have a large group of people. I think they just wanted to apply pressure against Israel where they could.

      I think it is based and probably the most effective thing they could do to stop the genocide.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Divesting is a step, but it just allows them to remove personal responsibility for the death/suffering. (Which matches the latent cultural narcissism)

        It does not actually stop anything, it may delay the scheduled future.

        Meanwhile bombs and bullets already in production will go down range.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Divesting is a step, but it just allows them to remove personal responsibility for the death/suffering.

          Uh, no. Divesting from South Africa had a big effect on the end of Apartheid. It’s just not enough to do much by itself. But it is enough to push it over the top.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      You attempt a lazy joke here because it seems you need attention, but policy like this matters, especially when things get “quiet” again after the spotlight fades. Also, in addition to divestment, the university also met their demand to appoint “a faculty member from Faculty for Justice in Palestine to sit on the finance committee, ensuring that investments remain ethical every year.”

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Attention seeking? It seems like this could have been a single student government vote.

        The university’s communications office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from Jezebel on whether it is referring explicitly to Israel, or whether it regards Israel’s actions in Gaza as falling under the umbrella of “genocide, ethnic cleansing, and activities that violate fundamental human rights.”

        And more effective, too.

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Edit: Actually, just posting a list of the hundred + of schools that have changed official investment policy is not a fair response. The point is that it happens all the time, but it doesn’t grab headlines. SGAs work with university leaders to cooperatively effect change not only on a regular basis, but as an essential part of their functioning.

            I’m happy to repost the list if you would like.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, attention seeking - your undereducated pussyfooting is transparent, exhausting and embarrassing, friend.

    • Cas9111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      They did win. They know now that University is morally right and doesn’t support a genocide.