• Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Our understanding of what “primitive” humans could do keeps expanding and pushing back further in time. This find moves the bar a very long way.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This blows my mind. It means that Neanderthals could have been building log cabins and their ancestors as well.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    So they talk about this as if it were a new innovation at the time—but could it be that this kind of woodworking was more widespread and this was just the only example to survive? Could it have been a standard part of the Acheulian toolkit?

    • Bored Stonerian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s probably the assumption they’re working with, because historians do it all the time. Document survival for the pre-modern period is so poor that it doesn’t take very many examples to demonstrate (for all intents and purposes) that something was widespread.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I think that was the time fire was discovered/harnessed. That’s old for human history.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I understand that science needs evidence, but I’m surprised at how surprised they sound when they manage to prove things people on YouTube have been adamant about for a long time.

  • novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would honestly be shocked if there were no Homo Erectus cities and large scale societies. They existed for far longer than us, and were almost if not just as smart as us.