A new study has found that Americans, including traditionally pro-gun groups, are averse to living near AR-15 owners and neighbors who store guns insecurely. This consensus highlights potential local-level agreement on gun safety practices.

A recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that across all political and social groups in the United States, there is a strong preference against living near AR-15 rifle owners and neighbors who store guns outside of locked safes. This surprising consensus suggests that when it comes to immediate living environments, Americans’ views on gun control may be less divided than the polarized national debate suggests.

The research was conducted against a backdrop of increasing gun violence and polarization on gun policy in the United States. The United States has over 350 million civilian firearms and gun-related incidents, including accidents and mass shootings, have become a leading cause of death in the country. Despite political divides, the new study aimed to explore whether there’s common ground among Americans in their immediate living environments, focusing on neighborhood preferences related to gun ownership and storage.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      9·
      6 months ago

      Fair enough for a general survey question. However, the point about how policy decisions shouldn’t be based on opinion/anecdote is still valid (at least in the case of gun control).

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          6·
          6 months ago

          How people feel is important to know because it will influence how a change needs to be presented.

          In this example: A lot of oeople feel safer owning guns, science show they’re wrong and it actually decreases their safety, in order to be able to change things in a way that people will accept it that perception needs to be changed.

        • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
          4·
          6 months ago

          I could understand the argument for factoring people’s feelings into policy in some cases, but let’s take this study as an example.

          Handguns are responsible for far more harm than AR-15s, but this study shows people “fear” AR-15s more. A policy that is based on these findings and not empirical data may attempt to reduce gun violence by addressing AR-15 ownership. Thereby not having a major effect on reducing actual gun violence.

          A policy focusing on reducing handgun ownership would be much more effective at reducing gun violence, despite people not fearing them as much.

            • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
              1·
              6 months ago

              I think you’re confusing me with other commentors. I haven’t suggested this research in particular is being actively used to support policy decisions. Nor have I suggested this research is advocating for policy.

              In my initial comment I simply said policy in general (at least with gun control) shouldn’t be based on people’s feelings/anecdotes.

              I think this study asked a very interesting question, and I find the results to be very interesting. I don’t really have any issues with this research by itself.