fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoWe're all a little crazymander.xyzimagemessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up1623
arrow-up1623imageWe're all a little crazymander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squareOmega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoThis hypothesis is bullshit. There are far more than just two consciousnesses.
minus-square42yeah@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoUnrelated but “consciousnesses” sounds kinda funny
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agowe should go with “conscii”
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYeah, like, what are they trying to say?? That all of the consciousnesses belong to just two entities? That’s weird bro, sounds unhealthy, maybe they need help.
minus-squarejol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoRight? And they talk a lot with me. Actually sometimes they wont shut up.
minus-squareKeenFlame@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou mean identities, not consciousness
This hypothesis is bullshit. There are far more than just two consciousnesses.
Unrelated but “consciousnesses” sounds kinda funny
we should go with “conscii”
Yeah, like, what are they trying to say??
That all of the consciousnesses belong to just two entities? That’s weird bro, sounds unhealthy, maybe they need help.
Right? And they talk a lot with me. Actually sometimes they wont shut up.
You mean identities, not consciousness