• Atheran@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That only tells me that you’re scouring Wikipedia and the Internet for surface reading to be feeding your imaginary conflict.

    Marx supported free trade. That’s true. Why? Because it would hasten the economic imbalance between the classes and help create a revolution. No, he was not Ben Shapiro of the 19th century. He thought that things must get worse before they get better and that free trade would make them worse.

    You also mention how he was heavily influenced by Adam Smith. He critiqued him heavily in both Das Capital and the Theories of Surplus Value.

    That’s like saying Engels was a fan of Duhring because he wrote a doorstopper called Anti-Duhring. That’s plain wrong and trying to murk the waters.

    As for the central planning it was first established as a method from planned economy in social states by the Soviet Union, that’s true. But its theoretical basis stems from Marx’s work and words. “To my mind, the so-called ‘socialist society’ is not anything immutable… It’s crucial difference from the present order consists naturally in production organized on the basis of common ownership by the nation of all means of production.” that sounds familiar? Written in Marx’s letters in 1890.

    But no, I was not referring to central planning, but the abolishment of capitalist goals as surplus value, profit driven economy etc, that are most definitely based on his works. Yes, he was not the first to propose that “Oy, killing miners for scraps is bad and you’re bad for doing it.” but nobody before (to my knowledge) had done such an extensive work on the downfalls of capitalist economy and how something else could even be planned or work.

    I’m getting tired of you using catchy article headlines and wiki skims to prove me wrong because you don’t like Marx. In fact, I don’t care if you do or not, or what type of communism you prefer. But stop spreading lies for the people that are not familiar with the subject.

    In fact, I don’t even care much about Marx. Of the big ones to speak on socialism/communism, I much prefer Engel’s more philosophical approach than Marx’s economic analysis. I find the analysis boring.

    • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, just to let you know before I block you utter <bleep>, I was reading Marx when you were just a wet spot, and I actually do happen to „like“ him. But funny that you only now come quoting him, after I handed you half of the exact quote you’re giving. But I’m the one scouring Wikipedia 😂

      • Atheran@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Resorting to personal attacks. Typical. Way to come up on top in an argument. Attack the person, not the argument.

        And I don’t. Give me philosophy over economics any time. That doesn’t mean I don’t see his value. And how comes you’re still confused after giving me the quote already?