I don’t know if others are experiencing a similar situation. My all feed is very sparse with engagement. If I sort top six hours or by top 12 most posts have between 5-10 comments. I feel like there was more in the past? Is engagement dropping off? I’m on lemmy.world as my instance.

  • themusicman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Most of that shouldn’t be considered extreme. Yeah “eat the rich” style rhetoric is inflammatory, but the rest is just pretty bog standard leftist stuff. There’s far more extreme stuff on Reddit, on all the political fringes.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re literally proving their point. You’re saying “I don’t see anything wrong with this, it’s perfectly normal to me and I’m fine if this kind of thing dominates my feed”. Their entire complaint is how normalized this kind of rhetoric has become and how pervasive it is and your response is basically “this is fine” dog.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      They believe in the q-anon child blood theft thing. It’s not rhetoric or hyperbole, they literally want to murder people. The ‘eat the rich’ rhetoric isn’t just inflamatory, it encourages people to actually commit violence, whether that’s what you really want them to do or not.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon#Child_sex_trafficking_and_satanic_sacrifice

          Added to this is the belief that politicians and Hollywood elites engage in “adrenochrome harvesting”, in which adrenalin is extracted from children’s blood to produce the psychoactive drug adrenochrome.

          One version of the QAnon theory posits that the child abusers use adrenochrome as an elixir to remain young.

          That’s what they’re referencing when they mention drinking children’s blood.

          • themusicman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You sure? They specifically mention blood transfusion, which is obviously an actual real transfer of blood from the young/healthy(/poor?) to the old/sick(/wealthy?). It’s not clear to me whether “children” is hyperbole or conspiracy.